<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/_xslt/rss20_xhtml10_strict.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Yellow Hibiscus Integrity</title>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://www.xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067" type="text/xml"/>
    <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright/>
    <generator>xFruits - http://www.xfruits.com</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>media integrity</category>
    <item>
      <title>More GOP promotion: Fox News lets Hayworth plug his  website</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On Fox News' <em>Your World</em>,  guest host Stuart Varney let former Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ) promote his  candidacy for Arizona's U.S. Senate seat and encourage viewers to visit his campaign website. Fox News has promoted the political campaigns of other  GOP candidates this year -- including helping them raise funds and solicit volunteers.</p><h2>Fox
again lets GOP candidate plug his website on air</h2>

<p><strong>Hayworth's "recommendation" 
to Fox News
viewers: "Go to the website JDForSenate.com."</strong>
From the February 8 <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201002080038">pointed</a>
 viewers to his campaign
website, solicited funds for his campaign, and also cited <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fredinvadesblue.com%2F">RedInvadesBlue.com</a>,
where, he said, "we have a money bomb right now that's hitting ... and 
you
can help me fight back against the machine."</p>

<p><strong>"Political analyst" Morris: "Please, please
help" Brown. </strong>During the January 11 edition of <em>Hannity</em>, Fox News contributor 
Dick Morris <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201001120025">urged</a> 
viewers to "go to
DickMorris.com ... to help elect Brown," because if "we win this
fight, then there will never be another victory for Obama." 
DickMorris.com
included a fundraising 
plea
"to help us raise $300,000 for a last minute media buy to push Brown and
the Republicans to victory"; Fox News executives allowed Morris to solicit funds
for Republican efforts despite reportedly telling colleague Mike 
Huckabee to
cease conflict-of-interest promotions that help his political action 
committee.</p>

<p><strong>Fox plays GOP ad attacking 
Kirk's opponent, compares
Kirk favorably to Brown.</strong> During its February 3 <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201002030053">two weeks</a>
 leading up to the November
3, 2009, elections, Conservative Party congressional candidate Doug 
Hoffman,
New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie, and 
Virginia
Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell appeared on Fox News 
and its
personalities' radio shows at least 16 times for live interviews lasting
 a
total of 114 minutes and 36 seconds. Christie made at least five 
appearances
totaling almost 37 minutes on Fox News and its personalities' radio 
shows;
McDonnell made at least three appearances totaling 18 minutes; and 
Hoffman made
at least seven appearances totaling almost 60 minutes. </p>

<p><strong>Fox News hosts, political 
analysts spend Election Day
celebrating and shilling for conservatives and GOPers.</strong>
 On
November 4, 2009, numerous Fox News hosts and political analysts <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911040009">encouraged</a>
 voters to donate to and
volunteer and vote for GOP and conservative candidates, including 
Christie,
McDonnell, and Hoffman. The Fox News personalities included Mike 
Huckabee, Sean
Hannity, Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich, Tammy Bruce, and Eric Bolling. </p>

<p><strong>Leading up to elections, Fox
 personalities promoted
conservative and GOP candidates and helped fundraise for them.</strong>
Fox News hosts and analysts offered support for McDonnell, Christie, and
Hoffman and their fundraising efforts leading up to the elections. For 
example,
on his November 2, 2009, Fox News show, Hannity <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911020053">told</a> 
Hoffman, "I hope I'm on
the air this time tomorrow night and I'll be able to declare you the
winner." On November 3, 2009, on Twitter, Fox News contributor Karl Rove
 <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911030049">encouraged</a>
 his followers to donate
to the Republican Governors Association in order to help Christie's 
campaign.
On two Fox News shows in October 2009, Huckabee <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911020005">directed</a>
 viewers to "go to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fbalancecutsave.com%2F">balancecutsave.com</a>," 
urging
them to sign a petition telling Congress to "balance the budget,"
"cut their spending," and "save American families"; however,
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fbalancecutsave.com%2F" target="_blank">balancecutsave.com</a>
 redirected visitors
to Huckabee's political action committee, which financially supports 
Republican
candidates. Subsequently, Huck PAC apparently emailed petition signers 
-- who
were required to provide an email address in order to sign the
"balancecutsave" petition -- a "newsletter" urging
political action on behalf of Republican-backed candidates Bob 
McDonnell, David
Harmer, and Doug Hoffman.</p>
<h2>Fox
News operates as a conservative political organization</h2>

<p><strong>"Voice of the opposition": 
Fox News openly
advocates against Democratic Congress, White House. </strong>Since
Barack
 Obama's inauguration, Fox News has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/reports/200909110016" target="_blank">frequently engaged</a>
in political advocacy against the Democratic Congress and White House.
Specifically, Fox News personalities have promoted and encouraged 
viewers to
"join" tea party protests, Glenn Beck's organization The 9-12 Project
and its September 12, 2009, "March on Washington," and town hall
meetings; engaged in a witch hunt seeking to "get rid of" Obama
administration officials and nominees; implored viewers to call Congress
 and
the White House to protest Democratic policies; and celebrated
"victor[ies]" when Democratic legislation has been stalled.</p>

<p><strong>Research and communications 
arm: Fox News is home to GOP in
exile.</strong> A <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910260005" target="_blank">revolving door</a>
exists between the Republican Party and Fox News Channel, with a number 
of former
Bush administration officials, former and potentially future GOP 
presidential
candidates, and Republican strategists on Fox's payroll and airwaves. A <em>Media Matters </em>review of Fox 
coverage from
September 1, 2009, through October 25, 2009, revealed that these 
individuals,
typically hosted alone or on unbalanced panels, often used their airtime
 to
advance false and misleading claims about Democrats and progressives, as
 well
as to fundraise, further demonstrating that Fox is effectively a 
conservative
political organization and not a legitimate news outlet.</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546391" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546391&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080049</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080049</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sarah Palin: "One state even spent a million bucks to put up signs that advertise that they were spending on the federal stimulus projects."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: Half-True  |   Palin claims a state paid $1 million to advertise that they were spending stimulus money
<br/>
<p>In her keynote speech at the Tea Party convention on Feb. 6, 2010, Sarah Palin mocked some of the spending in the massive economic stimulus championed by President Barack Obama."One state even spent a million bucks to put up signs that advertise that they were spending on the federal stimulus projects," Palin said. "Or as someone put it, this was a million dollar effort using your money to tell you it's spending your money. And it didn't create a single job."Many stimulus projects are simply wasteful, she said."And in the case of ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/08/sarah-palin/palin-claims-state-paid-1-million-advertise-they-w/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509774" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:48:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509774&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F08%2Fsarah-palin%2Fpalin-claims-state-paid-1-million-advertise-they-w%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/08/sarah-palin/palin-claims-state-paid-1-million-advertise-they-w/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>San Francisco's Toxic Sludge - It's Good for You!</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fifteen years ago, CMD's book <em><a href="http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy.html" title="reference on Toxic Sludge Is Good for You!" target="_blank">Toxic Sludge Is Good for You!</a></em> first exposed the hidden government and industry PR campaign <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=greenwashing" title="reference on greenwashing" target="_self">greenwashing</a> toxic <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=sewage_sludge" title="reference on sewage sludge" target="_self">sewage sludge</a> as "<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=biosolids" title="reference on biosolids" target="_self">biosolids</a>," an invented PR euphemism used to cynically <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=You_say_biosolids,_I_say_sewage_sludge" title="reference on re-brand toxic waste as "fertilizer"" target="_self">re-brand toxic waste as "fertilizer"</a> given free to farmers. Today, unfortunately, the biosolids scam is bigger than ever. The <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Organic_Consumers_Association" title="reference on Organic Consumers Association" target="_self">Organic Consumers Association</a> (OCA) <a href="http://www.organicconsumers.org/sludge.cfm" title="reference on reports" target="_blank">reports</a> that "San Francisco has come up with an ingenious plot to trick city residents into taking their toxic sewage sludge back and disposing of it in their own gardens. San Francisco is having <a href="http://www.sludgenews.org/industry/sludge.aspx?id=11" title="reference on Synagro, the corporate giant of the toxic sludge industry" target="_blank">Synagro, the corporate giant of the toxic sludge industry</a>, 'compost'  some of the toxic sewage sludge. Then they give it away to San Francisco's gardeners telling us it's 'high-quality, nutrient-rich, organic Biosolids Compost.' "  OCA has <a href="http://capwiz.com/grassrootsnetroots/issues/alert/?alertid=14646196" title="reference on launched a grassroots campaign" target="_blank">launched a grassroots campaign</a> calling on San Francisco's mayor to stop the practice, noting "municipal sewage sludge routinely contains thousands of dangerous pathogens, toxic heavy metals, flame retardants, endocrine disruptors, carcinogens, pharmaceutical drugs and other hazardous chemicals coming from residential drains, storm water runoff, hospitals, and industrial plants."
</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581550" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8885#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581550&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8885</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/54">activism</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8885 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[John Stauber]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bolton: Either Iran Gets Nukes Or ‘Israel Or Sombody Else Uses Military Force To Stop It’</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Last week, Iran&#8217;s President Mahmoud Amadinejad said Tehran would have &#8220;no problem&#8221; agreeing on a deal to send its enriched uranium abroad for further enrichment. But today, Iran told the IAEA that it would back out of the deal and begin enriching its uranium stockpile in Iran. 
On Fox News today, John Bolton declared that [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546411" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/bolton-iran-military-force/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546411&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fbolton-iran-military-force%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Iran&#8217;s President Mahmoud Amadinejad said Tehran would have &#8220;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8494772.stm">no problem</a>&#8221; agreeing on a deal to send its enriched uranium abroad for further enrichment. But today, Iran told the IAEA that it would back out of the deal and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/world/middleeast/09iran.html?ref=world">begin enriching</a> its uranium stockpile in Iran. </p>
<p>On Fox News today, John Bolton declared that &#8220;Iran simply has no intention of being talked out of its nuclear weapons program&#8221; and that &#8220;very severe sanctions&#8221; will not work. Later, when host Gregg Jarrett asked if military action is &#8220;the only answer,&#8221; Bolton agreed:</p>
<blockquote><p>JARRETT: Is military force probably in the end the only answer?</p>
<p>BOLTON: <strong>There are two outcomes, one is Iran getting its nuclear weapons, the other is Israel or somebody uses military force to stop it. That’s where we are</strong>. </p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it: </p>
<p><center><object width="325" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SpzHd7g_OzY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SpzHd7g_OzY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="325" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Bolton has been calling for military strikes on Iran to eliminate its nuclear program for sometime, despite claiming that he &#8220;always said, that the use of force against Iran’s nuclear program is <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/14/bolton-iran-unattractive/">deeply unattractive</a>.&#8221; Last year, he said that &#8220;targeted force&#8221; is the &#8220;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/02/bolton-targeted-force-iran/">only option</a>.&#8221; </p>
<p>But Bolton conveniently never discusses the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/01/colin-kahl-interview/">sobering</a> <a href="http://">consequences</a> of military action on Iran. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said war with Iran would be &#8220;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/28/gates-iran-disasterous/">disastrous</a>&#8221; and &#8220;the last thing we need.&#8221; &#8220;There is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/world/middleeast/28nuke.html?_r=1">no military option</a> that does anything more than buy time,&#8221; Gates said last year. Retired Gen. Anthony Zinni <a href="http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2009/09/anthony_zinni_o/">answered</a> war hawks like Bolton calling for military action against Iran: </p>
<blockquote><p>After you’ve dropped those bombs on those hardened facilities, what happens next? &#8230;  <strong>[E]ventually, if you follow this all the way down, eventually I’m putting boots on the ground somewhere. And like I tell my friends, if you like Iraq and Afghanistan, you’ll love Iran</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>A top defense official said an attack probably would “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/01/colin-kahl-interview/">incentivize the Iranians</a> to go all the way to weaponize&#8221; their nuclear material and have &#8220;a number of destabilizing&#8221; consequences for the region. Bolton actually thinks attacking Iran &#8220;would lead to <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/06/bolton-stability-in-region/">greater stability</a> in the region&#8221; but that if anything goes wrong, a simple &#8220;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/12/23/bolton-iran-public-diplomacy/">campaign of public diplomacy</a>&#8221; will sort everything out. </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Radical Right-Wing Agenda</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81302</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Ben Armbruster]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fox  Nation, WND spread falsehood about yet another Obama appointee</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Linking to a  WorldNetDaily post, Fox Nation falsely claimed that Missouri Governor Jay  Nixon (D), who President Obama  has appointed to the newly created, bipartisan Council of Governors, "links  Christians with violence." In fact, the report by a Missouri  state agency to which the post  referred did not reference Christianity, but rather noted ties between  the radical  "Christian  Identity"  movement -- identified by the  Anti-Defamation League as a "racist and anti-Semitic religious sect" linked to  several terrorist attacks -- and the militia  movement.</p><h2><strong>Fox Nation claims
Missouri Gov. Nixon "links Christians with violence" </strong></h2>

<p><strong>Fox
Nation asserts: "Another Obama Nominee Links Christians with Violence." </strong>The Fox
Nation <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefoxnation.com%2Fgov-jeremiah-nixon%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fanother-obama-nominee-links-christians-violence">posted</a>
a picture of Nixon over the headline "Another Obama Nominee Links Christians
with Violence": </p>

<p>&nbsp;<img src="http://mediamatters.org/static/images/item/foxnation-20100208-violence.jpg" border="0" alt="Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. ?ui=2&amp;view=att&amp;th=126aeeaab4e23c8c&amp;attid=0.1&amp;disp=attd&amp;realattid=ii_126aeeaab4e23c8c&amp;zw" title="?ui=2&amp;view=att&amp;th=126aeeaab4e23c8c&amp;attid=0.1&amp;disp=attd&amp;realattid=ii_126aeeaab4e23c8c&amp;zw" style="border: 0pt none;" /></p>

<p><strong>Fox Nation linked to WND article headlined:
"Obama's new pick: Gov. of state that linked Christians, violence." </strong>The Fox Nation post linked to a February 7 WND
article that bore the headline<strong>:</strong> "Obama's new pick: Gov. of state that
linked Christians, violence." The WND article <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wnd.com%2Findex.php%3Ffa%3DPAGE.view%26pageId%3D124238">asserted</a>:
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>It
was in 2009 when the MIAC [Missouri Information Analysis Center] issued a
report that not only linked conservative groups to domestic terrorism and
warned law enforcement to watch for vehicles with bumper stickers promoting
Paul and Baldwin, it also warned police to watch out for individuals with
"radical" ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing
illegal immigration, abortion and federal taxes.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><strong>In fact, neither Nixon nor MIAC "linked 
Christians with violence"</strong></h2>

<p>
<strong>Report actually 
linked "members of the militia movement" to the ideology of "Christian 
Identity." </strong>The February 2009 MIAC 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scribd.com%2Fdoc%2F13290698%2FThe-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-">Strategic 
Report</a> titled "The Modern Militia 
Movement" did not mention "Christians" at all. 
Instead, it stated that "members of the militia movement often subscribe" to 
extremist movements, such as the "Christian Identity" sect: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p><strong><em>Militia 
Trends:<br />
<br />
</em></strong>Ideologies<strong><br />
<br />
</strong>Members of 
the militia movement 
often subscribe to the ideology of other right-wing extremist movements such as: 
<strong><br />
<br />
Christian Identity:</strong> 
Religious ideology popular in extreme right-wing circles. Adherents believe that 
whites of European decent can be traced back to the "Lost Tribes of Israel." 
Many consider Jews to be the Satanic offspring of Eve and the Serpent, while 
non-whites are "mud people" created before Adam and 
Eve.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>MIAC 
language came from ADL, who identified Christian Identity a "racist and 
anti-Semitic religious sect." </strong>The 
language used to describe Christian Identity adherents in the MIAC report comes 
directly from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adl.org%2Flearn%2Fext_us%2FChristian_Identity.asp%3FLEARN_Cat%3DExtremism%26LEARN_SubCat%3DExtremism_in_America%26xpicked%3D4%26item%3DChristian_ID">states</a> that Christian Identity is a "racist and 
anti-Semitic religious sect." ADL also says of Christian Identity adherents: 
"Overall level of criminal activity is high, ranging from hate crimes to acts of 
terrorism." From 
ADL:</p>
<blockquote>

<p><strong>Christian 
Identity</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Origins</strong>: Mid-20th Century (origins date to 
mid-19th Century) <br />
<strong>Background</strong>: 
A racist and anti-Semitic religious sect whose adherents believe that white 
people of European descent are the descendants of the "Lost Tribes" of ancient 
Israel. <br />
<strong>Influential Personalities</strong>: Howard Rand, 
William Cameron, Wesley Swift, Bertrand Comparet, Richard Butler, William Potter 
Gale, James K. Warner, Sheldon Emry, Dave Barley, Pete Peters<br />
<strong>Ideology</strong>: Anti-Semitic, racist, 
anti-government, conspiratorial <br />
<strong>Outreach</strong>: Churches, pamphlets, tracts, 
books, shortwave radio, Web sites Estimated Size: 25,000 to 50,000 <br />
<strong>Criminal activity</strong>: Overall level of 
criminal activity is high, ranging from hate crimes to acts of terrorism 
<br />
<br />
Christian Identity is a religious ideology popular in extreme right-wing 
circles. Adherents believe that whites of European descent can be traced back to 
the "Lost Tribes of Israel." Many consider Jews to be the Satanic offspring of 
Eve and the Serpent, while non-whites are "mud peoples" created before Adam and 
Eve. Its virulent racist and anti-Semitic beliefs are usually accompanied by 
extreme anti-government sentiments. Despite its small size, Christian Identity 
influences virtually all white supremacist and extreme anti-government 
movements. It has also informed criminal behavior ranging from hate crimes to 
acts of terrorism.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>ADL 
has linked Christian Identity to multiple terrorist attacks. 
</strong>According to the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adl.org%2Flearn%2Fext_us%2FChristian_Identity.asp%3FLEARN_Cat%3DExtremism%26LEARN_SubCat%3DExtremism_in_America%26xpicked%3D4%26item%3DChristian_ID">ADL</a>, 
"In the 1990s, Identity criminal activity continued apace, including efforts by 
an Oklahoma Identity minister, Willie Ray Lampley, to commit a series of 
bombings in the summer of 1995 in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing by 
Timothy McVeigh." ADL also states:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>In 1998, Eric Rudolph, 
who had been associated with Identity ministers such as Nord Davis and Dan 
Gayman, became a fugitive after allegedly bombing gay bars, the Atlanta Summer 
Olympics, and an abortion clinic. The following year, Buford Furrow, a former 
Aryan Nations security guard, went on a shooting spree at a Jewish Community 
Center in Los Angeles, wounding four children and an adult, and later killing a 
Filipino-American postal worker.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Report reportedly "developed" under GOP governor</h2>

<p><strong>Report was 
reportedly "developed" under previous the previous governor, a Republican.</strong> The <em>St. Louis Post-Dispatch</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2F74.125.113.132%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3ACj5Y0TEidawJ%3Awww.senate.mo.gov%2Fsnc%2F2009%2F06-June%2F061209.doc%2B%2522Republicans%2C%2Bparticularly%2BLt.%2BGov.%2BPeter%2BKinder%2C%2Bseized%2Bon%2Bthe%2Breport%2Bas%2Ban%2Bopportunity%2Bto%2Battack%2BGov.%2BJay%2BNixon%2C%2Ba%2BDemocrat.%2BThe%2Breport%2Bcame%2Bout%2Bon%2BNixon%2527">article</a>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>It was in 2009 when the MIAC issued 
a report that not only linked conservative groups to domestic terrorism and 
warned law enforcement to watch for vehicles with bumper stickers promoting Paul 
and Baldwin, it also warned police to watch out for individuals with "radical" 
ideologies based on Christian views, such as opposing illegal immigration, 
abortion and federal taxes. </p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Report actually 
linked militia to "anti abortionist[s] like Olympic Park Bomber. 
</strong>The report actually 
states:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>Members of the militia movement 
often subscribe to the ideology of other right-wing extremist movements such 
as:</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p><strong>Militant 
Abortion: </strong>Ant Abortionists have been known to 
take up arms in support of their belief. Eric Rudolph who was responsible for 
the Atlanta Olympic Park Bombing and abortion clinics was an anti 
abortionist.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Fox Nation previously 
suggested Obama nominee's criticism of Christian Identity referred to Christians 
</h2>

<p>Fox Nation previously <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201001120023">linked</a> to a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.videojug.com%2Finterview%2Fterrorist-groups-2">video</a> 
of Erroll Southers, then the Obama administration nominee to be chief of the 
Transportation Security Administration, with the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefoxnation.com%2Ferroll-southers%2F2010%2F01%2F11%2Fvideo-will-pres-obamas-tsa-nominee-recover">text</a>, 
"The most threatening homegrown terror groups in the U.S. are 'Christian 
identity-oriented,' 'anti-government, anti-abortion,' 'survivalist,' 'white 
supremacist' groups." In fact, Southers <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201001110048">was referring</a> to 
members of the Christian Identity group.</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546392" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546392&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080042</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080042</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Perino advances  shoe bomber falsehood to attack Obama over handling of  terrorism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On&nbsp;<em>Fox &amp; Friends</em>, former White House  press secretary Dana Perino attempted  to rebut the Obama administration's comparison of their use of civilian trials  for alleged terrorists with the Bush administration's similar treatment of shoe  bomber Richard Reid by falsely suggesting that "there wasn't a system in place"  for Bush to order Reid to be held by the military. In fact, such a system was in place by the time  Reid pleaded guilty, as many suspects were placed in military detention before that date.  <br />
</p>

<p>From the
February 8 edition of Fox News'&nbsp;<em>Fox &amp; Friends</em>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PERINO: Well, and I -- and the
administration continues to tout that during the Bush years, we prosecuted two
terrorists, Moussaoui and Reid, like they want to do for Khalid Shaikh
Mohammed. And I really want to take a moment just to put that in context.
Moussaoui was arrested before 9-11. Reid was arrested six weeks after President
Bush first gave the order to do enemy combatant status, and there wasn't a
system in place. We're nine years later, and if the only thing they can look
back on in the Bush administration to say that was done well was the
prosecution of Richard Reid, I would be shocked if that was the case. I'm sure
that is not what they believe. And I really think they ought to look at that
before they claim that that was the best way to do it. Because I think,
arguably, we could have done things better. We just didn't have the system yet.
And it was right after 9-11.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Before Reid
pleaded guilty, Bush placed hundreds of detainees in military custody</h2>

<p><strong>Order
Perino referenced stated that military could hold detainees "outside or within
the United States."</strong>&nbsp;Reid <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fbi.gov%2Fpublications%2Fterror%2Fterrorism2002_2005.htm%23page_11">was
captured</a> in December 2001. Bush's
November 13, 2001, "Military Order"&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fgeorgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov%2Fnews%2Freleases%2F2001%2F11%2F20011113-27.html" target="_blank">explicitly stated</a>&nbsp;that
"Any individual subject to this order shall be ... detained at an appropriate
location designated by the Secretary of Defense outside or within the United States."
The order defined the term "individual subject to this order" as follows:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>The term "individual subject to this
order" shall mean any individual who is not a United States citizen with
respect to whom I determine from time to time in writing
that:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>(1)&nbsp; there is reason to believe that such individual,
at the relevant times,</p>
<blockquote>

<p>(i) is or was a member of the organization known as al
Qaida;</p>

<p>(ii) has engaged in, aided or abetted, or conspired to
commit, acts of international terrorism, or acts in preparation therefor, that
have caused, threaten to cause, or have as their aim to cause, injury to or
adverse effects on the United States, its citizens, national security, foreign
policy, or economy; or</p>

<p>(iii) has knowingly harbored one or more individuals
described in subparagraphs (i) or (ii) of subsection 2(a)(1) of this
order;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>and</p>

<p>(2)&nbsp; it is in the interest of the United States that such individual
be subject to this order.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Detainees
held by the military as early as November 2001.
</strong>Soon after the war in Afghanistan
began in October 2001, the United
  States began holding detainees in military
custody. For instance, in the 2006 case of&nbsp;<em>Hamdan v. Rumsfeld</em>, the
Supreme Court majority opinion&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.supremecourtus.gov%2Fopinions%2F05pdf%2F05-184.pdf%23page%3D9" target="_blank">stated</a>&nbsp;that in
November 2001, the plaintiff in that case, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, "was captured by militia forces and turned over to the U. S.
military."</p>

<p><strong>Padilla
transferred to military custody before Reid pleaded guilty in civilian court.</strong>&nbsp;Reid&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fbi.gov%2Fpublications%2Fterror%2Fterrorism2002_2005.htm%23page_11" target="_blank">pleaded guilty</a>&nbsp;on
October 4, 2002, and was sentenced on January 30, 2003.&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.humanrightsfirst.org%2Fus_law%2Finthecourts%2Fpadilla_briefs%2FJoint_Submissions%2FJoint_Appendix%2FOpinion_and_Order_of_the_District_Court.pdf" target="_blank">Jose Padilla</a>&nbsp;was
initially held in the civilian court system after his arrest on a material
witness charge and was transferred to military custody on June 9, 2002.
(Padilla was later&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2005%2FLAW%2F11%2F22%2Fpadilla.case%2Findex.html" target="_blank">transferred back</a>&nbsp;to civilian custody for
trial after he appealed his detention to the Supreme Court for a second time.)</p>

<p><strong>Hamdi
held in military custody since early 2002.</strong>&nbsp;In addition to
Padilla,&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fsupct.law.cornell.edu%2Fsupct%2Fhtml%2F03-6696.ZO.html" target="_blank">Yaser Hamdi</a>&nbsp;was
held in military custody at Guantanamo
Bay beginning in January 2002 and
transferred to a military brig in South
  Carolina in April 2002.</p>

<p><strong>Hundreds
of detainees held in military custody at Guantanamo
beginning in early 2002.</strong>&nbsp;In the 2004&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.cornell.edu%2Fsupct%2Fhtml%2F03-334.ZO.html" target="_blank">case</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<em>Rasul v. Bush</em>, Justice
Stevens, writing for the majority, stated: "Petitioners in these cases are 2
Australian citizens and 12 Kuwaiti citizens who were captured abroad during
hostilities between the United
  States and the Taliban. Since early 2002,
the U.S. military has held
them -- along with, according to the Government's estimate, approximately 640
other non-Americans captured abroad -- at the Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay."</p>
<h2>Bush
administration bragged about handling of Reid</h2>

<p><strong>Ashcroft:
Reid case an example of "steady progress because of the combined and
cooperative efforts of law enforcement and intelligence."</strong>&nbsp;From
an August 25&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.justice.gov%2Farchive%2Fag%2Fspeeches%2F2003%2F082503patriotactremarks.htm" target="_blank">speech</a>&nbsp;by
then-Attorney General John Ashcroft:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>Around this nation, we can point to quiet,
steady progress&nbsp;<tt>because of the combined and cooperative
efforts of law enforcement and intelligence</tt>:</p>

<p>[...]</p>
<blockquote>

<p>132 individuals have been convicted or pled guilty,
including shoe-bomber Richard Reid, "American Taliban" John Walker
Lindh, six members of the Buffalo cell, and two members of the Detroit
cell</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546393" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546393&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080041</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080041</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cantor Opens The Door To GOP Rejecting Obama’s Bipartisan Health Care Meeting</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In an interview with CBS News&#8217; Katie Couric that aired before the Super Bowl yesterday, President Obama announced &#8220;that he would convene a half-day bipartisan health care session at the White House to be televised live this month.&#8221; “I want to come back and have a large meeting, Republicans and Democrats, to go through systematically [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546412" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/cantor-health-care-meeting/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546412&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fcantor-health-care-meeting%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with CBS News&#8217; Katie Couric that aired before the Super Bowl yesterday, President Obama announced &#8220;that he would convene <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/08/us/politics/08webobama.html?ref=politics">a half-day bipartisan health care session at the White House</a> to be televised live this month.&#8221; “I want to come back and have a large meeting, Republicans and Democrats, to go through systematically all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward,” said Obama. </p>
<p>The top Republicans in both the House and Senate responded by saying that while they &#8220;<a href="http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=169690">look forward</a>&#8221; to the discussion and&#8221;<a href="http://mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=PressReleases&#038;ContentRecord_id=2c18f37f-2ec9-4948-b113-82e07cf7733a&#038;ContentType_id=c19bc7a5-2bb9-4a73-b2ab-3c1b5191a72b&#038;Group_id=0fd6ddca-6a05-4b26-8710-a0b7b59a8f1f">appreciate the opportunity to share ideas</a> with the President,&#8221; they believe that the &#8220;<a href="http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=169690">best way to start on real, bipartisan reform would be to scrap</a>&#8221; the health care reform bills that have passed both the House and Senate. The office of another GOP leader, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA), <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/cantor-only-route-to-bipartisan-cooperation-is-if-dems-fully-embrace-gop-plan/">suggested that Republicans would not attend</a> the White House meeting unless the Democrats abandoned their proposals:</p>
<blockquote><p>After going it alone on health care reform for nearly a year, President Obama has decided he wants to bring Republicans into the conversation. <strong>Here’s the problem: unless the President and Speaker Pelosi are willing to scrap their government take over and hit the reset button, there’s not much to talk about.</strong></p>
<p>Republicans believe the status quo is unacceptable, but so is any health reform package that spends money we don’t have or raises taxes on small businesses and working families in a recession. <strong>To that point, House Republicans have offered the only plan</strong>, that will lower health care costs, which is what the President said was the goal at the start of this debate.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Plum Line&#8217;s Greg Sargent writes that Cantor is essentially saying &#8220;that the only way Dems can win bipartisan cooperation is to <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/cantor-only-route-to-bipartisan-cooperation-is-if-dems-fully-embrace-gop-plan/">fully embrace the GOP health care plan and nothing more</a>.&#8221; Cantor&#8217;s stubborn refusal to discuss health care openly with Obama appears to have support in the conservative base. Michelle Malkin wrote today that &#8220;Republicans should feel zero obligation to participate in yet another White House health care dog-and-pony show: <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/obamas-kabuki-summit-invitation-just-say-no/">Just say no</a>.&#8221; On Fox News, conservative consultant Andrea Tantaros &#8212; who <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201002030042">works for a PR firm</a> that represents health care clients &#8212; declared that &#8220;the only way Republicans should meet with&#8221; Obama is if he &#8220;is committed to starting over, scrapping that stinker of a bill.&#8221; Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pEhrdL5iu-0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pEhrdL5iu-0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" height="260" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>The White House <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/02/bama_calls_the_next_play_for_h.html">does not intend to start over</a> at the meeting. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told the Huffington Post&#8217;s Sam Stein today that while Obama is willing to &#8220;add various elements&#8221; to health care legislation suggested by Republican lawmakers, he is &#8220;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/08/exclusive-sebelius-says-o_n_453340.html">absolutely not</a>&#8221; hitting the reset button on the legislative process.</p>
<p>The Wonk Room&#8217;s Igor Volsky notes that &#8220;at the end of the day, it will be <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/obamas-health-summit/">up to the Republicans to meet the Democrats half way</a>&#8221; and &#8220;if they still insist on starting over, they’re effectively taking themselves out of the process and giving the reins to the Democrats.&#8221; After crowing about <a href="http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=168022">the need for more transparency</a> in health care negotiations, will Republicans follow through on Cantor&#8217;s threat to boycott public, televised discussions with the president that could result in <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/02/five_compronises_in_health_car.html">more Republican ideas</a> being incorporated into reform?</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Radical Right-Wing Agenda</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81348</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Matt Corley]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Campaign Advisors Influence Ukraine's Election</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Citizens in the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ukraine" title="reference on Ukraine" target="_self">Ukraine</a> are starting to see American-style campaign sloganeering and other tactics in the race between their Prime Minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, and her main rival, Viktor Yanukovich, for the office of President. Tymoshenko's banners, billboards and posters bear slogans like "They talk, she works," "They promise, she works," and "They betray, she works." The ad campaign is significant because it is the product of the American political consulting firm <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=AKP%26D_Message_%26_Media" title="reference on AKP&amp;D Message &amp; Media" target="_self">AKP&amp;D Message &amp; Media</a>, the company founded by <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama" title="reference on President Obama's" target="_self">President Obama's</a> chief advisor, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_Axelrod" title="reference on David Axelrod" target="_self">David Axelrod</a>. Axelrod's son, Michael, still works for the firm.  Mr. Yanukovich is being advised by <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Paul_J._Manafort,_Jr." title="reference on Paul Manafort" target="_self">Paul Manafort</a>, a Republican strategist from the firm <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Davis,_Manafort_%26_Freedman,_Inc." title="reference on Davis, Manafort &amp; Freedman, Inc." target="_self">Davis, Manafort &amp; Freedman, Inc.</a>, which has advised several U.S. presidents. Ukraine's outgoing president, Victor Yushenko, received American-style help and campaign advice from Hillary Clinton's campaign strategist, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mark_Penn" title="reference on Mark Penn" target="_self">Mark Penn</a>, who was president of the big American PR firm, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Burson-Marsteller" title="reference on Burson-Marsteller" target="_self">Burson-Marsteller</a>. The Ukraine is a gold mine for big American political firms, since it is one of the largest countries in Europe, has obscure and weakly-enforced campaign laws, and the major Ukrainian political parties are backed by big businesses, with money to finance professional campaigns.
</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581551" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8884#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:52:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581551&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8884</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/62">international</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8884 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Anne Landman]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sarah Palin: "Barack Obama had 150 days in the U.S. Senate where he was able to vote quite often 'present.' "</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: False  |   Palin says Obama voted "present" in U.S. Senate "quite often"
<br/>
<p>In an interview with FoxNews.com at the National Tea Party Convention on Feb. 6, 2010, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin reprised a Republican talking point from the 2008 presidential campaign by criticizing President Barack Obama for his lack of executive experience.Asked by FoxNews.com's Judd Berger whether she thought she's "more qualified to be president than President Obama," Palin referred to the debate over "experience" from the 2008 contest between Obama and her running mate, Arizona Sen. John McCain:"The whole qualification issue still perplexes me, because in the campaign we tried to bring attention to the fact ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/08/sarah-palin/palin-says-obama-voted-present-us-senate-very-ofte/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509775" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509775&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F08%2Fsarah-palin%2Fpalin-says-obama-voted-present-us-senate-very-ofte%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/08/sarah-palin/palin-says-obama-voted-present-us-senate-very-ofte/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fox News: Palin’s ‘Telepalmer’ Notes Were A Clever Plot To Call Attention To Obama’s Teleprompter</title>
      <description><![CDATA[As ThinkProgress reported on Saturday night, paid Fox News contributor Sarah Palin was caught using &#8220;hand&#8221;-written notes during a Q &#038; A session at the National Tea Party Convention this weekend. Ironically, during the appearance, Palin also criticized President Obama for using a teleprompter during speeches. 
On Fox &#038; Friends this morning, the hosts defended [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546413" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/fox-palin-telepalmer/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:38:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Ffox-palin-telepalmer%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>As ThinkProgress reported on Saturday night, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/us/politics/06palin.html">paid Fox News contributor</a> Sarah Palin was <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/06/palin-hand/">caught using &#8220;hand&#8221;-written notes</a> during a Q &#038; A session at the National Tea Party Convention this weekend. Ironically, during the appearance, Palin also <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0210/Fox_to_air_Palins_Tea_Party_address.html">criticized</a> President Obama for using a teleprompter during speeches. </p>
<p>On Fox &#038; Friends this morning, the hosts defended their colleague&#8217;s <a href="http://rewinn.blogspot.com/2010/02/palin-invents-telepalmer.html">Telepalmer notes</a>. Carlson suggested that it was a brilliantly clever plot to draw attention to Obama&#8217;s use of a teleprompter: </p>
<blockquote><p>CARLSON: <strong>I think she did it on purpose. I think she did it on purpose, yeah. Because it&#8217;s an exact opposite of reading off the teleprompter with a script written for you with every word in a sentence and here&#8217;s she&#8217;s just taking crib notes on her hand. It makes her look like she can just talk off the cuff</strong> and she just jotted down a few couple notes before she went out to give a big long speech.</p>
<p>DOOCY: I think she did it because she probably does it a lot. <strong>I do that all the time.</strong> [...]</p>
<p>KILMEADE: But to sit there and look at, and do the interview and look down at her hand, <strong>I think that is &#8212; like you said before, Gretchen &#8212; folksy, absolutely, down-to-earth, I can identify.</strong> But if you&#8217;re going to write on your hand, why not just say, &#8217;staffer, hand me a card.&#8217; And then it would be okay.</p>
<p>CARLSON: <strong>Nah, like I said, I think it was on purpose. But anyway, we we may never know.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jruif5hbA8s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jruif5hbA8s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Event organizers admitted the questions were &#8220;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32627.html">pre-screened</a>,&#8221; but a Palin spokesperson said the former VP candidate had not seen the questions ahead of time. Still, as Huffington Post&#8217;s Stefan Sirucek points out, Palin&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stefan-sirucek/did-palin-use-crib-notes_b_452458.html">extra help</a>&#8221; in front of a friendly crowd is especially ironic because Obama wasn&#8217;t using notes of any kind during a recent <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stefan-sirucek/did-palin-use-crib-notes_b_452458.html">unscripted Q &#038; A with House Republicans</a>. Obama has also recently held <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/01/obamas-town-in-florida-play-by-play/1">several</a> <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/01/23/2010-01-23_bam_rolls_up_sleeves_hits_ohio_diner_to_revive_magic_after_mass_loss.html">town</a> <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-5738-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2010m2d2-Video-Live-coverage-and-blogging-of-President-Obamas-town-hall-in-New-Hampshire">halls</a>, where he took questions from the audience and spoke at length without notes.</p>
<p>Transcript:<span id="more-81292"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>DOOCY: One of the first things she said, was she took a shot at the guy who used a teleprompter. And yet, they looked at some of the closeup photographs of her hands during something and as you can see, right there, it says at the top, she&#8217;s written on her own hand. She wrote the word &#8216;energy,&#8217; something illegible, then &#8216;taxes,&#8217; and &#8216;lift America&#8217;s spirits.&#8217; Seven words. And those on the left, a number of people on the left have said, &#8216;oh look, she&#8217;s taking a shot at the guy using a teleprompter, but here she is, she&#8217;s a nincompoop who writes on her hand.&#8217;</p>
<p>CARLSON: I think she did it on purpose. I think she did it on purpose, yeah. Because it&#8217;s an exact opposite of reading off the teleprompter with a script written for you with every word in a sentence and here&#8217;s she&#8217;s just taking crib notes on her hand. It makes her look like she can just talk off the cuff and that she just she jotted down a few couple notes before she went out to give a big long speech.</p>
<p>DOOCY: I think she did it because she probably does it a lot. I do that all the time. </p>
<p>CARLSON: You do?</p>
<p>KILMEADE: I&#8217;m personally jealous because I used to get in trouble if I wrote on my palm because my mom explained to me that the ink would get through my pores and I would die, so I stopped doing that in the fifth grade.</p>
<p>KILMEADE: Why doesn&#8217;t she just &#8212; there&#8217;s nothing wrong if she had a card. Just jot a card down. Energy, taxes, hope, whatever it is. But, and then no one has problems looking down. But to sit there and do the interview and look down at her hand, I think that is &#8212; like you said before Gretchen &#8212; folksy, absolutely, down-to-earth, I can identify. But if you&#8217;re going to write on your hand, why don&#8217;t you just say staffer, hand me a card. And then it would have been okay.</p>
<p>CARLSON: Nah, like I said, I think it was on purpose. But anyway, we may never know.</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Media Accountability</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81292</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Alex Seitz-Wald]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rep. John Murtha passes away.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Democratic Rep. John Murtha (PA), who served in Congress since 1974, passed away today. Murtha had been in intensive care after complications arose from his gall bladder surgery a couple of weeks ago. The statement from his office:
Congressman John P. Murtha (PA-12) passed away peacefully this afternoon at 1:18 p.m. at Virginia Hospital Center [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546414" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/murtha-passes-away/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:58:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546414&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fmurtha-passes-away%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/AP090529144652-1e.jpg" alt="John Murtha" title="John Murtha" width="166" height="248" class="imgright"/> Democratic Rep. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gqk0uASArXE">John Murtha</a> (PA), who served in Congress since 1974, passed away today. Murtha had been in <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/02/rep-john-murtha-is-in-intensive-care-after-surgery/1">intensive care</a> after complications arose from his gall bladder surgery a couple of weeks ago. The statement from his office:</p>
<blockquote><p>Congressman John P. Murtha (PA-12) passed away peacefully this afternoon at 1:18 p.m. at Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington, VA.  At his bedside was his family.  </p>
<p>Murtha, 77, was Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.  </p>
<p>First elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in February of 1974, Murtha dedicated his life to serving his country both in the military and in the halls of Congress.  A former Marine, he became the first Vietnam War combat Veteran elected to the U.S. Congress. </p>
<p>This past Saturday, February 6, 2010, Murtha became Pennsylvania’s longest serving Member of Congress.</p></blockquote>
<p>Murtha was close to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111600514.html">supported his bid to become Majority Leader</a>, but he was eventually beaten by Steny Hoyer (MD). During the Bush administration, Murtha became a forceful, outspoken voice for Iraq redeployment. In November 2005, the former Marine and Iraq war hawk came out and called for an immediate U.S. withdrawal in Iraq. His stance was a turning point in the war debate, clearing the way for more Democrats to speak up. &#8220;The U.S. cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1117-08.htm">It is time to bring them home</a>,&#8221; he declared. Murtha had also been <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/12/18/house-ethics-office-ends-probe-of-murtha-2-others/tab/article/">dogged by ethics allegations</a> regarding earmarks and his <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/13/AR2006111301322.html">relationship with defense contractors</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Think Fast</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81382</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Amanda Terkel]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sarah Palin Gets a Hand Up</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="inline left"><img src="/files/images/Palincribnotes.jpg" width="140" height="120" align="right" alt="Palin's crib notes" /><span class="caption" style="width: 138px;"><i>Palin's crib notes</i></span></span>Ex-Alaska Governor <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin" title="reference on Sarah Palin" target="_self">Sarah Palin</a> is becoming more vocal and visible in recent days, and indications are that the upswing will continue. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fox_News" title="reference on Fox News" target="_self">Fox News</a> is building a television studio in Palin's living room in her home in Wasilla, Alaska, so she will be able to reach her political base without leaving home. Palin also sends messages out to her 1.3 million Facebook friends, writes columns for newspapers, sends out Tweets and signs copies of her books for donors to her political action committee. Last weekend, she  delivered a paid speech to the Salina, Kansas <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Chamber_of_Commerce" title="reference on Chamber of Commerce" target="_self">Chamber of Commerce</a>, headlined the national <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tax_Day_Tea_Party|" title="reference on Tea Party" target="_blank">Tea Party</a> convention in Nashville and make an appearance in Texas to support Governor Rick Perry's re-election bid. She also emailed an endorsement for Dr. Rand Paul in Kentucky's Republican Senate primary and, through Facebook, and called for the resignation of White House chief of staff, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Rahm_Emmanuel" title="reference on Rahm Emmanuel" target="_self">Rahm Emmanuel</a>, for using the term &quot;retarded&quot; in a private meeting. Palin also received some criticism for referring to <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama" title="reference on President Obama" target="_self">President Obama</a> in her Nashville speech as a &quot;charismatic guy with the teleprompter,&quot; while referring to <a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/21288" title="reference on crib notes she had scrawled on her hand" target="_blank">crib notes she had scrawled on her hand</a> during the same speech.</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581552" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8883#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581552&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8883</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/67">media</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8883 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Anne Landman]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Moore&amp;nbsp;brings small business tax falsehood back to Fox</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On Fox News,&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;senior economics writer Stephen Moore advanced a long-time Republican falsehood by claiming that "the big problem" with small business tax credits in the proposed jobs bill "is that a lot of small businesses are looking ahead at what is going to happen next year with the big increases on tax increases when the Bush tax cuts go away." However, despite Moore's suggestion that the&nbsp;Obama administration's proposal to&nbsp;eliminate&nbsp;the Bush tax cuts&nbsp;for wealthy taxpayers&nbsp;would affect&nbsp;a large percentage of small businesses, in fact, it would apply to fewer than 1.3&nbsp;percent&nbsp;of all those who&nbsp;declare small business&nbsp;income.<br />
<br />
</p>

<p>From the February 8 edition of Fox
News'&nbsp;<em>America's
Newsroom</em>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>GREGG JARRETT (co-host): Look,
Steve, aren't those elements the kinds of things that Republicans&nbsp;normally
embrace? And won't they be hard-pressed to object?<br />
<br />
MOORE: Well,
this package is certainly a lot better than the first one because it does
involve some incentives for small businesses to hire, which I'm obviously very
much in favor of. Two-thirds of all the jobs come from small businesses. The
problem is, Gregg, at the very same time they're talking about new tax credits
for small businesses to hire workers and so on -- by the way, which is
something we tried in the 1970s; it didn't work too well -- the big problem
here is that a lot of small businesses are looking ahead at what's going to
happen next year with the big increases on tax increases when the Bush tax cuts
go away. So I would be -- I think President Obama would be much better off just
saying, look, we're just going to make sure that the tax rates that are in
place right now don't go up because most of the businesses that get hammered by
the tax increase next year will be the very same small businesses the president
is trying to help in this package.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>
Obama's tax proposal
would&nbsp;only raise taxes on fewer than 1.3
percent&nbsp;of those who claim small business income</h2>

<p>
<strong>Obama's proposal would end Bush tax cuts for individuals making over
$200,000, families making over $250,000.&nbsp;</strong>The 2011 White House budget
proposal&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov%2Fomb%2Fbudget%2Ffy2011%2Fassets%2Fbudget.pdf%23page%3D42">states</a>&nbsp;that
"the President supports allowing those tax cuts that affect families
earning more than $250,000 a year to expire and committing these resources to
reducing the deficit instead. This step will have no effect on the 98 percent
of all households who make less than $250,000." The budget plan&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov%2Fomb%2Fbudget%2Ffy2011%2Fassets%2Ftables.pdf%23page%3D20">lists</a>&nbsp;several
"Upper-Income Tax Provisions" that would roll back the Bush tax cuts
for individuals with income greater than $200,000 and families with income
greater than $250,000.<br />
<br />
<strong>Fewer than 1.3&nbsp;percent&nbsp;of
those who claim small business income would be affected by expiration of Bush
tax cuts to wealthy taxpayers.</strong>&nbsp;Despite Moore's claim that "most
of the businesses" would "get hammered by the tax increase next
year," according to the Tax Policy Center's&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.taxpolicycenter.org%2Fnumbers%2Fdisplayatab.cfm%3FDocID%3D2242%26topic2ID%3D60%26topic3ID%3D68%26DocTypeID%3D7">table</a>&nbsp;of
2009 tax returns that reported small-business income, 457,000 of those returns -- or 1.3&nbsp;percent&nbsp;of
them -- are in the top two income&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irs.gov%2Fpub%2Firs-drop%2Frp-09-50.pdf%237">tax brackets</a>,
which include all filers with taxable incomes that would be affected by Obama's
proposal to end those Bush tax cuts.&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Moore&nbsp;revives GOP talking point
previously parroted by the media</h2>

<p><strong>Claim previously advanced during
presidential campaign, again in early
2009.&nbsp;</strong>As&nbsp;<em>Media
Matters for America&nbsp;</em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080010">documented</a>,
in July 2008, several media outlets uncritically advanced Sen. John McCain
false claim that "[i]f you are one of the 23 million small business owners
in America who files as an individual rate payer, Senator Obama is going to
raise your tax rates." In February and March 2009,&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200903260012">several</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200902270005">media</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200902260012?f=s_search">figures</a>&nbsp;adopted
this false Republican talking point or allowed the falsehood to go&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200902260003">unchallenged</a>.</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546394" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:27:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546394&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080030</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080030</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opposition to gays serving openly in the military has ‘declined sharply’ amongst servicemembers.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[After Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen&#8217;s declaration that he believes it is time to repeal Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell, the Military Times has released a poll of 3,000 active-duty troops showing that opposition to gay men and women serving openly in the military &#8220;has fallen sharply from nearly two-thirds (65 percent) [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546415" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/dadt-military-poll/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fdadt-military-poll%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dadtattpoll.gif" alt="Military Times poll" title="Military Times poll" width="180" height="290" class="imgright"/> After Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen&#8217;s declaration that he believes <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/02/mullen-dadt-2/">it is time to repeal Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</a>, the Military Times has released a poll of 3,000 active-duty troops showing that opposition to gay men and women serving openly in the military &#8220;<a href="http://militarytimes.com/news/2010/02/military_dontask_survey_020510w/">has fallen sharply</a> from nearly two-thirds (65 percent) in 2004 to about half (51 percent) today.&#8221; According to the poll, among the servicemembers&#8217; concerns were &#8220;how to effectively implement new policies for sharing close quarters and living facilities with openly gay members.&#8221; <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/15/democracy-corps-dadt/">Polls</a> of the American public consistently showing majority support for overturning DADT. A December 2006 poll of servicemembers who had served in Iraq or Afghanistan also found <a href="http://www.zogby.com/CSSMM_Report-Final.pdf">73 percent</a> of those polled were “comfortable with lesbians and gays.” On Thursday, the Senate Armed Services will be holding <a href="http://armed-services.senate.gov/e_witnesslist.cfm?id=4405">a hearing on DADT</a>. </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Think Fast</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81313</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Amanda Terkel]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Right-wing media jump to defend Palin after "crib note" criticism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Right-wing media figures&nbsp;have rushed to defend&nbsp;Sarah Palin from criticism that she apparently wrote&nbsp;"crib notes" on her hand during her Tea Party Convention appearances by claiming, among other things, that&nbsp;it's a "non-issue" and that&nbsp;having notes on her&nbsp;hand was "folksy," "down to earth," and "just like busy moms."</p><h2>Right-wing media&nbsp;defend&nbsp;"busy mom"&nbsp;Palin's "crib note[s]" by claiming it's "folksy" and "down to earth"</h2>

<p><em><strong>Fox &amp; Friends</strong></em><strong>: Palin was "folksy," "down to earth," and "it's an exact opposite of reading off the teleprompter."&nbsp;</strong>On Fox News'&nbsp;<em>Fox &amp; Friends</em>, after co-host Steve Doocy noted that the "left" was criticizing Palin for apparently using crib notes while she took a "shot at the guy who uses a teleprompter," co-host Gretchen Carlson replied, "I think she did it on purpose. Yeah, because I think it's an exact opposite of reading off the teleprompter. Reading off complete script written for you with every word in a sentence, and here she's just taking crib notes on her hand. It makes it look as if she can just talk off the cuff and that she just jotted down a few couple notes before she went off to give a big, long speech." Later, co-host Brian Kilmeade called it "folksy," and "down to earth." From the February 8 edition of&nbsp;<em>Fox &amp; Friends</em>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>CARLSON: I think she did it on purpose.</p>

<p>DOOCY: You do?</p>

<p>CARLSON: I think she did it on purpose. Yeah, because I think it's an exact opposite of reading off the teleprompter. Reading off complete script written for you with every word in a sentence, and here she's just taking crib notes on her hand. It makes it look as if she can just talk off the cuff and that she just jotted down a few couple notes before she went off to give a big, long speech.</p>

<p>KILMEADE: I am jealous.</p>

<p>DOOCY: I think she did -- I think she did it because she probably does it a lot. I do that all the time.</p>

<p>KILMEADE: I personally am jealous, because I used to get in trouble if I wrote on my palms because my mom explained to me the ink would get through my pores and I would die. So I stopped doing that in the fifth grade.</p>

<p>DOOCY: Really?</p>

<p>KILMEADE: Why doesn't she just -- there's nothing wrong with if she had a card. Just jot a card down -- energy, taxes, hope, whatever it is. But -- then no one has a problem. But to sit there and look at -- do the interview and then look down at her hand, I think that is -- it's, like you said, Gretchen, before, folksy, absolutely. Down to earth. I can identify. But if you're going to write it on your hand, why not just say, staffer, can you hand me a card? And then it would have been OK.</p>

<p>CARLSON: Like I say, I think it was on purpose. But anyway, we may never know. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>
<br />
<strong>Gateway Pundit's Hoft: It's a "non-issue" for the "TelePrompter-less former Governor."&nbsp;</strong>On Gateway Pundit, blogger Jim Hoft&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fgatewaypundit.firstthings.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fawesome-palin-campaigns-for-rick-perry-writes-hi-mom-on-her-hand-pics%2F" target="_blank">wrote</a>: "On Sunday the left&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2Fstefan-sirucek%2Fdid-palin-use-crib-notes_b_452458.html" target="_blank">went bonkers</a>&nbsp;after they discovered that the TelePrompter-less former Governor Sarah Palin&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2Fstefan-sirucek%2Fdid-palin-use-crib-notes_b_452458.html" target="_blank">wrote notes</a>&nbsp;on the palm of her left hand for&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fgatewaypundit.firstthings.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fliveblogging-sarah-palin-at-the-nashville-national-tea-party-convention%2F" target="_blank">her speech</a>&nbsp;to the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville. The far left absolutely freaked over this&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foundingbloggers.com%2Fwordpress%2F2010%2F02%2Ffounding-bloggers-confirms-huffington-posts-completely-worthless-observation%2F" target="_blank">non-issue</a>&nbsp;rather than focus on her brilliant speech knocking the Obama Administration's horrid record on&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fgatewaypundit.firstthings.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fbarack-obama-gives-himself-a-b-for-tripling-deficit-nearly-doubling-unemployment-in-one-year%2F" target="_blank">economics</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fgatewaypundit.firstthings.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fdetroit-christmas-bomber-interrogated-for-less-than-one-house-gibbs-defends-administrations-actions%2F" target="_blank">national defense</a>."&nbsp;<br />
<strong><br />
NRO's Spruiell writes in defense of Palin: She "speaks from concise notes like everybody else. And, like other busy moms, she sometimes writes notes on her hand."</strong>&nbsp;Stephen Spruiell at the National Review Online blog The Corner&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcorner.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DODU3YzkwMGYxZGY1NGQ2OTZiZWZhMWIzOTNkZTU1ZWE%3D" target="_blank">wrote</a>&nbsp;of the criticism: "On the left, where this opinion of Palin already prevails, anything which reinforces it will be picked up and cheerfully passed around. And, to the extent that anyone not on the left notices this giddy snobbery, it will play to Palin's strengths." He continued, "For example, one might say: 'Unlike the guy who needs a three thousand dollar teleprompter to get out of bed in the morning, Palin speaks from concise notes like everybody else. And, like other busy moms, she sometimes writes notes on her hand.' The comeback is so obvious that, again, I really can't figure out why Palin's detractors are bringing this up at all."</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546395" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:15:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546395&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080024</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080024</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bachmann’s Plan: To Deal With Debt, We Must ‘Wean Everybody’ Off Social Security, Medicare</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This past weekend, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) addressed the right-wing Constitutional Coalition&#8217;s annual conference in St. Louis. She had dropped out of the Tea Party Convention occurring on the same day in Nashville to make the appearance. 
Speaking to a small group of conference attendees and ThinkProgress during lunch on Saturday, Bachmann outlined how the [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546416" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/bachmann-remove-socialsecurity/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546416&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fbachmann-remove-socialsecurity%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bachmann.jpg' class=imgright alt='bachmann.jpg' />This past weekend, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) addressed the right-wing Constitutional Coalition&#8217;s annual conference in St. Louis. She had dropped out of the Tea Party Convention occurring on the same day in Nashville to make the appearance. </p>
<p>Speaking to a small group of conference attendees and ThinkProgress during lunch on Saturday, Bachmann outlined how the Republican Party and its 2012 nominee must address the national debt. Bachmann referenced Glenn Beck, who <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/ryan-on-social-security-cuts-plan-if-i-lose-my-job-over-this-fine.php">falsely</a> warned about a $107 trillion in supposed &#8220;unfunded liabilities&#8221; from Social Security and Medicare. She then called for a “reorganization” of entitlements where people “already in the system” would continue to receive benefits, but “everybody else” would be weaned off:</p>
<blockquote><p>BACHMANN: Is the country too big to fail? No, the country can fail. We can, we&#8217;re not invincible. And we&#8217;re so close now to being at that point because the thing is, as Glenn Beck said last night, it is true. The $107 trillion that he put on the board. We&#8217;re $14 trillion in debt, but that doesn&#8217;t include the unfunded massive liabilities. That&#8217;s $107 trillion, and that&#8217;s for Social Security and Medicare and all the rest. You add up all those unfunded net liabilities, and all the traps that could go wrong we&#8217;re on the hook for, and what it means is what we have to do is a reorganization of all of that, Social Security and all. We have to do it simply because we can&#8217;t let the contract remain as they are because the older people are going to lose. So, what you have to do, is keep faith with the people that are already in the system, that don&#8217;t have any other options, we have to keep faith with them.<strong> But basically what we have to do is wean everybody else off. And wean everybody off because we have to take those unfunded net liabilities off our bank sheet, we can&#8217;t do it. </strong>So we just have to be straight with people. <strong>So basically, whoever our nominee is, is going to have to have a Glenn Beck chalkboard and explain to everybody this is the way it is. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Bachmann is echoing a growing chorus in the GOP caucus. Recently, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) introduced an alternative budget plan which would privatize both Medicare and Social Security. As the Wonk Room&#8217;s Pat Garofalo <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/02/06/conservatives-ryan-budget/">has noted</a>, the type of private Social Security accounts <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/ryan-on-social-security-cuts-plan-if-i-lose-my-job-over-this-fine.php">Ryan proposes</a> would have cost seniors tens of thousands of dollars in the 2008-2009 market plunge. But Bachmann takes Ryan&#8217;s effort a step farther and seems to be suggesting a full repeal of the retirement safety net.  </p>
<p>Bachmann, who has <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/23/boehner-cantor-bachmann-2/">gained influence</a> within Republican leadership circles, was a star at the event. At his speech on Friday, Glenn Beck proclaimed that Bachmann was the only person he trusted in Congress. Other accolades for Bachmann were heard throughout the conference. At one point, Heritage Foundation scholar Matt Spalding, who had been whispering in Bachmann&#8217;s ear while other panelists spoke, exclaimed, &#8220;if there&#8217;s one person who everyone at Heritage has a crush on, it&#8217;s Michele Bachmann.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Radical Right-Wing Agenda</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81306</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Lee Fang]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As Democrats Get Tough On Financial Reform, Republicans Court Big Banks</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Wary of impending reforms following the financial crisisr, the financial sector &#8212; whose irresponsible behavior was a major factor in causing the global recession &#8212; donated heavily to members of both parties during last year&#8217;s election cycle. In all, the financial, insurance, and real estate industries (collectively known as &#8220;FIRE&#8221;) donated $476 million to federal [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546417" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/big-banks-republicans/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546417&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fbig-banks-republicans%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/afwes.jpg" alt="afwes" title="afwes" width="210" height="136" class="alignright size-full wp-image-81299" />Wary of impending reforms following the financial crisisr, the financial sector &#8212; whose irresponsible behavior was a major factor in causing the global recession &#8212; donated heavily to members of both parties during last year&#8217;s election cycle. In all, the financial, insurance, and real estate industries (collectively known as &#8220;FIRE&#8221;) donated <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F">$476 million</a> to federal campaigns in 2008, dwarfing nearly every other sector.</p>
<p>The 2010 election of Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) suggested the public is fed up with the financial industry&#8217;s heavy influence in our political system, combined with the fact that unemployment is <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-06/unemployment-rate-in-u-s-falls-to-9-7-factory-payrolls-grow.html">abnormally high</a> while big banks continued to <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2010/01/21/2010-01-21_goldman_talk_of_bonuses_could_prompt_protests.html">dole out huge bonuses</a>. A poll conducted among Brown voters who had previously supported Obama found that 51 percent of them believed &#8220;that Democratic policies were doing <a href="http://pr.thinkprogress.org/2010/01/pr20100121">more to help Wall Street than Main Street</a>.&#8221; </p>
<p>The Obama administration responded to the Massachusetts election by unveiling a new, tough set of financial reforms &#8212; crafted by former Fed Reserve chairman Paul Volcker &#8212; that would &#8220;put limits on the size of banks and&#8230;prohibit commercial banks from engaging in&#8230;<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/01/morning_report_the_volker_rule.html">proprietary trading</a>,&#8221; prompting one financial observer to remark that the &#8220;administration will do anything to stop us revisiting the financial abyss of 2008, and now, the man who ended the stagflation crisis of the 1970s, has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-g-mcdonald/the-volker-rule_b_437423.html">finally been heard</a>.&#8221; </p>
<p>The New York Times <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703575004575043612216461790.html?mod=e2tw">reports today</a> that the financial sector &#8212; which <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F">donated more</a> to Democrats than Republicans in the 2008 election cycle &#8212; is responding to the Democrats&#8217; populist push by channeling their contributions and support from the Democrats to the Republicans:</p>
<blockquote><p>[JP Morgan Chase] chief executive, Jamie Dimon, is a friend of President Obama’s from Chicago, a frequent White House guest and a big Democratic donor. Its vice chairman, William M. Daley, a former Clinton administration cabinet official and Obama transition adviser, comes from Chicago’s Democratic dynasty.</p>
<p>But this year Chase’s political action committee is sending the Democrats a pointed message. While it has contributed to some individual Democrats and state organizations, it has rebuffed solicitations from the national Democratic House and Senate campaign committees. <strong>Instead, it gave $30,000 to their Republican counterparts.</strong> [...]</p>
<p><strong>Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.</strong></p>
<p>“If the president doesn’t become a little more balanced and centrist in his approach, then he will likely lose that support,” said Kelly S. King, the chairman and chief executive of BB&#038;T. Mr. King is a board member of the Financial Services Roundtable, which lobbies for the biggest banks, and last month he helped represent the industry at a private dinner at the Treasury Department. [...]</p>
<p><strong>“If the president wanted to turn every Democrat on Wall Street into a Republican,” one industry lobbyist said, “he is doing everything right.”</strong> </p></blockquote>
<p>The Wall Street Journal reported last week that House Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703575004575043612216461790.html?mod=e2tw">made a pitch</a>&#8221; for supporting Republicans to Dimon while having drinks at a Capitol Hill restaurant. “I just don’t know how long you can expect people to contribute money to a political party whose main plank of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/08/us/politics/08lobby.html?hp">their platform is to punish you</a>,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said. </p>
<p>Reflecting on the Democrats&#8217; new aggressive stance against Wall Street, progressive strategist Mike Lux writes, &#8220;In my experience, the biggest single reason for Democrats avoiding populist rhetoric is worrying about the political donations you would lose as a result. &#8230; Democrats cannot win in the 2010 elections without going after the big banks, and that means they will have to give up a lot of money. The tradeoff is certainly worth it in terms of <a href="http://www.openleft.com/diary/16943/obama-goes-for-it">extra votes they will get</a>.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Public Corruption</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81263</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Zaid Jilani]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Behind the Veil: Covering Iraq's Women in Hiding</title>
      <description><![CDATA[ABOUT THE SERIES Welcome to The Investigators, an ongoing Web video series produced by the Center for Investigative Reporting highlighting incisive work—as it happens—by journalists around the world. The series features interviews with journalists, who share the stories behind their international investigations into human rights abuses, financial corruption, political malfeasance, environmental destruction, and other abuses of power. Often...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330269" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330269&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fbehind_the_veil.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/behind_the_veil.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Red flag": Perino still claiming Christmas bomber bought "one-way ticket"</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Criticizing the Obama administration for missing "all these red flags," Fox News contributor and former Bush press secretary Dana Perino claimed that Northwest Airlines bombing suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab "bought a one-way ticket" to the United States. However, administration officials have stated that Abdulmutallab flew to Detroit on a roundtrip ticket.</p><h2>Perino claimed
"one-way ticket" should have raised "red flags" </h2>

<p>
From the
February 8 edition of Fox News' <em>Fox &amp;
Friends</em>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PERINO: [T]here were all these red flags that weren't raised when
the underwear bomber came across, right? He bought all these -- he bought a
one-way ticket, he then clammed up. Plus he was connected to Yemen and Nigeria and that should have been a clue. Plus they didn't call the CIA which is what they
should have done.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>


But officials said
Abdulmutallab bought a roundtrip ticket to Detroit</h2>

<p>


<strong>NCTC Director: "[T]he fact is not that he bought a one-way
ticket; he bought a roundtrip ticket."</strong>
During a January 20 Senate <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fhsgac.senate.gov%2Fpublic%2Findex.cfm%3FFuseAction%3DHearings.Hearing%26Hearing_ID%3Ddb07fd72-c631-42ea-a514-215127425e3a" target="_blank">hearing</a> on the Christmas Day
attack, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nctc.gov%2Fabout_us%2Fdirector_bio.html" target="_blank">Michael Leiter</a>, director of the
National Counterterrorism Center corrected Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) claim that
"I think everybody know the facts of the Christmas bomber: a person buys a
ticket with cash -- one way ticket." Leiter stated, "I would correct the record on a couple of points. In fact, the fact is not that he bought a one-way ticket; he bought a roundtrip ticket. From the January 20 Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>MCCAIN: Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I thank the witnesses and I thank them for their continued service to the
country. I think everybody knows the facts of the Christmas bomber: a person
buys a ticket with cash -- one-way
ticket; his father has already warned the CIA; the series of missteps have
taken place were led to this near tragedy. And I thank the witnesses for their
candor in being forthcoming about these failures.</p>

<p>The president said, and I quote, on
January 7th, "I repeatedly made it clear in public with the American people
and in private with my national security team that I will hold my staff, our
agencies and the people in them accountable when they've failed to perform
their responsibilities at the highest level."</p>

<p>I'd like to ask all three witnesses:
Who's been held accountable? I'll begin with you, Mr. Leiter. Has anybody been
fired? Has anybody been transferred? Has anybody received a letter of
admonition? Has anybody been put on leave? Go ahead.</p>

<p>LEITER: Senator, we are in fact
conducting internal reviews to determine whether or not any of those should be
pursued.</p>

<p>MCCAIN: And how long will those reviews
take? It's fairly clear, the facts of what happened -- isn't it?</p>

<p>LEITER: Well, actually, I think many of
the facts are clear. I would correct
the record on a couple of points. In fact, the fact is not that he bought a one-way
ticket; he bought a roundtrip ticket.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>


<strong><em>LA Times</em>: Abdulmutallab
"had purchased a round-trip ticket -- not a one- way fare, as has been
widely reported," according to Obama administration. </strong>The <em>Los Angeles Times </em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Farticles.latimes.com%2F2010%2Fjan%2F13%2Fnation%2Fla-na-terror-ticket13-2010jan13" target="_blank">reported</a>
on January 13, "The alleged Christmas Day airline bomber had purchased a
round-trip ticket -- not a one- way fare, as has been widely reported -- the
Obama administration told congressional aides in a closed briefing
Tuesday." As Justin Elliot of Talking Points Memo <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fthe_flight_253_one-way_ticket_meme_a_media-propaga.php" target="_blank">noted</a> on January 11, numerous
media outlets reported that Abdulmutallab flew to the United States on a
one-way ticket and the <em>New York Times</em>
issued a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F12%2F30%2Fpageoneplus%2Fcorrections.html" target="_blank">correction</a> on December 30.</p>

<p>


<strong>Pete Williams: Abdulmutallab "bought his ticket for Detroit
... at the KLM office in Accra, paying $2,831 for a round-trip ticket."</strong> NBC's Pete Williams <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ffirstread.msnbc.msn.com%2Farchive%2F2010%2F01%2F05%2F2165748.aspx" target="_blank">reported</a> on January 5:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>


More
is known, now, about what he was doing in the weeks before he came to the U.S.
After going to Yemen early in Aug. 2009, he went to Ghana, arriving in the city
of Accra on Dec. 9, according to the government there, on an Ethiopian Airlines
flight from Dubai that went through Addis Ababa. He bought his ticket for
Detroit a week later at the KLM office in Accra, paying $2,831 for a round-trip
ticket.</p>

<p>On
Dec. 24, he flew from Accra to Lagos, on Virgin Nigerian Flight 804, on a
one-way ticket. From there, he began the journey to Detroit, connecting through
Amsterdam.</p>
</blockquote><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546396" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546396&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080014</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080014</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right-Wing, Pro-Business Advocacy Ad That Went Unnoticed During The Super Bowl</title>
      <description><![CDATA[While people were focused on the fact that CBS allowed a pro-life advocacy ad by Focus on the Family to play during the Super Bowl, another one by a right-wing group slipped in unnoticed: a &#8220;Defeat the Debt&#8221; ad showing schoolchildren pledging allegiance &#8220;to America&#8217;s debt, and to the Chinese government that lends us money.&#8221; [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546418" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/debt-berman/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546418&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fdebt-berman%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>While people were focused on the fact that CBS allowed a pro-life <a href="http://www.focusonthefamily.com/nsc/box/video_player.aspx?video=super_bowl_ad">advocacy ad by Focus on the Family</a> to play during the Super Bowl, another one by a right-wing group slipped in unnoticed: a &#8220;<a href="http://defeatthedebt.com/our-ads/pledge/">Defeat the Debt</a>&#8221; ad showing schoolchildren pledging allegiance &#8220;to America&#8217;s debt, and to the Chinese government that lends us money.&#8221; Watch it: </p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rRY5waZ4IbE&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rRY5waZ4IbE&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>This ad has <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/uncle-sam-down-and-out-as-congress-prepares-to-raise-debt-ceiling-82043357.html">run on other national networks</a> and is part of <a href="http://defeatthedebt.com/our-ads/">a campaign by the Employment Policies Institute</a> (EPI) that has featured full-page ads in national newspapers and a billboard in Times Square. EPI is a project of right-wing, pro-business lobbyist Rick Berman, also known as &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/05/60minutes/main2653020.shtml">Dr. Evil</a>.&#8221; Berman is &#8220;<a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/42277">one of Washington&#8217;s most notorious PR operatives</a>,&#8221; who uses his firm, <a href="http://www.bermanco.com/">Berman and Company</a>, to fund <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/42441">non-profit front groups for his clients</a>. </p>
<p>Over the years, Berman has gone after <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/05/60minutes/main2653020_page2.shtml">Mothers Against Drunk Driving, PETA</a>, and right-wing bogeyman ACORN, and tried to convince Americans that <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/2006-07-31-lobbyist-usat_x.htm">healthier foods</a>, raising the minimum wage, <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/36456">stopping smoking</a>, getting rid of <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2006-01-10/people/mercury-in-fish-baloney/">mercury in fish</a>, and unions are bad for them. Berman refuses to reveal his clients, although in 2007, CBS&#8217;s 60 Minutes <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/05/60minutes/main2653020_page2.shtml">revealed</a> that they included Coca-Cola, Tyson Chicken, Outback Steakhouse, and Wendy&#8217;s. According to the watchdog group CREW, Berman &#8220;<a href="http://www.bermanexposed.org/">runs at least 22 industry-funded projects</a>, such as the Center for Union Facts, and holds 23 &#8220;positions&#8221; within these various entities.&#8221; Watch Rachel Maddow&#8217;s November 2009 report on Berman:  </p>
<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AYGtkFoC" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" height="233" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center></p>
<p>The New York Times reported that EPI, &#8220;a conservative research group with close ties to business,&#8221; launched its campaign last fall and <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/business-linked-group-assails-growing-debt/">planned to spend approximately $5 million</a>.  </p>
<p>Until recently, CBS and other networks said they had a policy against airing advocacy ads during the Super Bowl. In the past, ads by groups such as <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR2010012902505.html">MoveOn.org, the United Church of Christ</a>, and the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/02/knbc-reject-ad/">pro-marriage equality group GetToKnowUsFirst.org</a> were rejected (even though networks have selectively decided to air other advocacy ads). This year, CBS controversially decided to accept a pro-life ad from Focus on the Family, saying that it had changed its policy and was willing to accept appropriate advocacy ads. </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Corporate Malfeasance</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81257</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Amanda Terkel]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fox hosts GOP candidate who assaulted detainee to criticize Obama's handling of bombing suspect</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Fox &amp; Friends</em>' Brian Kilmeade hosted Lt. Col. Allen West, a Republican congressional candidate in Florida, to criticize the Obama administration for its handling of Northwest Airlines bombing suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab without noting that West is a Republican candidate.&nbsp;Moreover, despite noting that West's "personal enhanced interrogation tactic" got him "essentially a forced retirement"&nbsp;from the Army, Kilmeade did not report that West's resignation came after he admitted that he "threatened to kill" an Iraqi detainee in his custody, that "four of his soldiers from the 220th Field Artillery Battalion beat the detainee on the head and body," and that, according to&nbsp;military&nbsp;prosecutors, he "followed up on that threat" to kill the detainee by shooting a pistol near his head.</p><h2><em>Fox &amp; Friends</em>&nbsp;hosts West to criticize Obama administration without noting he's a GOP congressional candidate</h2>

<p>
<strong>Kilmeade introduced West as a congressional candidate in Florida, did not note he is a Republican.</strong>Introducing West, Kilmeade said that West is "running for Congress in the 22nd congressional district here in Florida." At no point during the segment did Kilmeade note that West is a&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.palmbeachpost.com%2Fnews%2Fyoutube-video-boosts-klein-rival-s-fund-raising-193537.html%3Fcxtype%3Dynews_rss" target="_blank">Republican congressional candidate</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>
<strong>West criticized Obama administration's handling of Christmas Day bombing attempt.</strong>&nbsp;During the segment, West said, "When I look at what's going on right now with the Nigerian terrorist, it's almost like a Greek tragedy of epic proportion." West further stated&nbsp;that the Obama administration has "established a very dangerous paradigm with this Mirandizing" of terror suspects, "because now they're going to continue to come with more and more attacks, because we're -- they're coming here, and we're giving them lawyers."&nbsp;</p>
<h2>
Kilmeade did not note&nbsp;that West reportedly resigned from the Army "after pleading guilty to assaulting an Iraqi detainee during interrogation"</h2>

<p><strong>Kilmeade did not note circumstances of West's "forced retirement."</strong>&nbsp;Introducing the segment, Kilmeade said of West:&nbsp;"One of the reasons you're such a great guest is because your personal enhanced interrogation tactic got you essentially a forced retirement and saved a lot of lives in Iraq."&nbsp;</p>

<p>
<strong>West reportedly resigned "after&nbsp;pleading guilty to assaulting an Iraqi detainee during interrogation."</strong>According to a December 13, 2003, CNN.com&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2003%2FUS%2F12%2F12%2Fsprj.nirq.west.ruling%2Findex.html" target="_blank">report</a>, West admitted that&nbsp;he "threatened to kill" an Iraqi detainee in his custody, that he watched as "four of his soldiers from the 220th Field Artillery Battalion beat the detainee on the head and body," and that, according to military&nbsp;prosecutors, he "followed up on that threat" to kill the detainee by shooting a pistol near his head.&nbsp;A December 14, 2003,&nbsp;<em>Boston</em>&nbsp;<em>Globe</em>&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boston.com%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Fmiddleeast%2Farticles%2F2003%2F12%2F14%2Fus_officer_to_resign_for_assulting_iraqi%3Fmode%3DPF" target="_blank">article</a>&nbsp;further noted that a "disciplinary proceeding found that the actions by ... West were serious enough to 'merit a court-martial.' " From the&nbsp;<em>Globe</em>&nbsp;article: </p>
<blockquote>An American officer has been stripped of his command after pleading guilty to assaulting an Iraqi detainee during interrogation, the military announced yesterday.
A disciplinary proceeding found that the actions by Lieutenant Colonel Allen West were serious enough to "merit a court-martial." But the military said in a statement that mitigating circumstances -- specifically, the "stressful environment" of combat -- and West's distinguished service record prompted the Army to instead relieve West of his command, fine him $5,000, and order him back to the United States, where he will be allowed to retire.<br />
<br />
"Frustration and anger overcame his professional ethics and personal values, and he performed what he knew to be illegal and immoral acts," said the statement issued by the Army's Fourth Infantry Division.<br />
<br />
During a closed-door tribunal Friday in the town of Tikrit, West was found guilty of three counts of aggravated assault and a single count of communicating a threat. The ruling was issued after West pleaded guilty to misconduct.<br />
<br />
He is the most senior officer to receive disciplinary action since the start of the war. West served as a battalion commander with the Fourth Infantry Division and was in charge of about 800 soldiers operating in one of the most dangerous regions in Iraq. For the past few months, he has been confined to the division's base in Tikrit.<br />
<br />
The military said that during an interrogation of an Iraqi police officer Aug. 20 near the village of Taji, north of Baghdad, West fired his pistol near the head of the prisoner, threatened to kill him, and allowed his troops to beat the man. The detainee, Yahya Jhodri Hamoodi, was suspected of having knowledge of a planned attack on US troops in the Sunni Triangle, the region north and west of Baghdad that has been a hotbed of anti-US resistance. Scores of soldiers have been killed or wounded in bomb, rocket, and small-arms ambushes in the area.<br />
<br />
West acknowledged last month before a military tribunal that his actions were wrong, but said that at the time of the incident he believed he was protecting the lives of his troops. "If it's about the lives of my men and their safety, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can," West said during the earlier proceeding.<br />
<br />
The disciplinary action against West was ordered by General Raymond Odierno, commander of the Fourth Infantry Division.<br />
The military said that through his actions against the detainee, West "disobeyed laws, ignored orders ... and mortgaged future discipline in his unit. Without discipline, there is no trust, no cohesion, and no higher purpose for which we fight."<br />
<br />
But the military also stated, "while his crimes merit a court-martial, mitigating factors were considered, including the stressful environment &nbsp;... &nbsp;and Lieutenant Colonel West's record as an officer and commander." </blockquote><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546397" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546397&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002080008</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002080008</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Mocks Sarah Palin By Writing ‘Cheat Sheet’ On Her Hand</title>
      <description><![CDATA[On MSNBC&#8217;s Daily Rundown this morning, Andrea Mitchell reported that &#8220;one of the most interesting things&#8221; from Sarah Palin&#8217;s appearance at the Tea Party Convention this past weekend was the notes written on her hand. &#8220;Very clearly,&#8221; Mitchell observed, &#8220;were some cheat sheets.&#8221; 
Mitchell then mocked Palin by displaying her own hand, which had some [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546419" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/08/andrea-mitchell-palin-notes/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546419&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F08%2Fandrea-mitchell-palin-notes%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>On MSNBC&#8217;s Daily Rundown this morning, Andrea Mitchell reported that &#8220;one of the most interesting things&#8221; from Sarah Palin&#8217;s appearance at the Tea Party Convention this past weekend was <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/06/palin-hand/">the notes written on her hand</a>. &#8220;Very clearly,&#8221; Mitchell observed, &#8220;were some cheat sheets.&#8221; </p>
<p>Mitchell then mocked Palin by displaying her own hand, which had some handwriting on it. Holding up her hand for the camera, Mitchell joked that she wrote some things down &#8220;just in case I didn&#8217;t remember&#8221; what she wanted to say:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Picture-2.png" alt="Picture 2" title="Picture 2" width="311" height="236" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-81283" /></center></p>
<p>Mitchell&#8217;s joke then segued into an interesting conversation about the press corps&#8217; treatment of Palin. Host Chuck Todd &#8212; seemingly wary of taking a jab at Palin &#8212; attempted to defend her by arguing, &#8220;We&#8217;ve all done notes.&#8221; Mitchell responded by astutely noting Palin&#8217;s hypocrisy in <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/02/palin_hand_notes_obama_telepro.html">attacking Obama for using a Teleprompter</a>. &#8220;So she takes all these snarky shots at Barack Obama,&#8221; Mitchell said, leaving Todd to complete the sentence, &#8220;she undermined it a little bit.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If Mitt Romney had notes on his hand, wouldn&#8217;t we take it pretty seriously?&#8221; Mitchell asked. Todd responded, &#8220;She has different rules.&#8221; Watch the segment:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DDrX4_lsLKY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DDrX4_lsLKY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></center></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Media Accountability</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81282</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Faiz Shakir]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quick Fact:   Wallace revives Palin's "pal around with terrorists" claim without noting it was built on a falsehood</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During an interview with Sarah Palin on <em>Fox News Sunday</em>, host Chris Wallace aired a clip of Palin claiming during the 2008 presidential campaign that then-candidate Barack Obama had been "pal[ling] around with terrorists." But Wallace did not note that the <em>New York Times </em>article to which Palin originally attributed her claim actually found that "the two men do not appear to have been close." <br />
</p><h2>Wallace airs clip of Palin falsely claiming Obama was
"pal[ling] around with terrorists"</h2>

<p>From the February 7 <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201002070001">transcript</a>
of Palin's October 4, 2008, speech in Englewood,
 Colorado, posted by the <em>Times</em>: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>There
is a lot of interest, I guess, in what I read and what I've read lately. Well,
I was reading my copy of today's New York Times and I was interested to read
about Barack's friends from Chicago.
</p>

<p>I
get to bring this up not to pick a fight, but it was there in the New York
Times, so we are gonna talk about it. Turns out one of Barack's earliest
supporters is a man who, according to the New York Times, and they are hardly
ever wrong, was a domestic terrorist and part of a group that quote launched a
campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and US Capitol. Wow. These
are the same guys who think patriotism is paying higher taxes.</p>

<p>This
is not a man who sees America
as you see it and how I see America.
We see America
as the greatest force for good in this world. If we can be that beacon of light
and hope for others who seek freedom and democracy and can live in a country
that would allow intolerance in the equal rights that again our military men
and women fight for and die for for all of us. Our opponent though, is someone
who sees America
it seems as being so imperfect that he's palling around with terrorists who
would target their own country? </p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>The </strong><em><strong>Times</strong></em><strong> reported that "the two men do
not appear to have been close."</strong> "A review of records of the schools project and
interviews with a dozen people who know both men, suggest that Mr. Obama, 47,
has played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear
to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical
views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called 'somebody who engaged in
detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.' " [<em>The New
  York Times</em>, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2008%2F10%2F04%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2F04ayers.html%3F_r%3D1%26partner%3Drssuserland%26emc%3Drss%26pagewanted%3Dall%26oref%3Dslogin">10/3/08</a>]</p>

<p><strong>CNN Fact Check:
Palin statement "false."</strong> In an October 5, 2008, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fpoliticalticker.blogs.cnn.com%2F2008%2F10%2F05%2Ffact-check-is-obama-palling-around-with-terrorists%2F">fact
check</a>, CNN's Political Ticker blog found Palin's statement
"false," writing: "There is no indication that Ayers and Obama
are now 'palling around,' or that they have had an ongoing relationship in the
past three years. Also, there is nothing to suggest that Ayers is now involved
in terrorist activity or that other Obama associates are."</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546398" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546398&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002070019</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002070019</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quick Fact: Palin  repeats falsehood that Alaska produces "20  percent of the U.S. domestic supply of  energy"</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During  an interview with <em>Fox News Sunday </em>host Chris Wallace, Fox News contributor Sarah Palin falsely claimed  that "20 percent of the US  domestic supply of energy" comes from Alaska. In fact, according to the most recent  data available from the  Energy Information Administration, Alaska accounts for no more than 2.9 percent  of total domestic energy production.  <br />
</p>

<p>From the February 7 edition of 
<em>Fox News 
Sunday</em>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>CHRIS 
WALLACE (HOST): Would you say you're more knowledgeable about domestic and 
foreign affairs now than you were two years ago?</p>

<p>PALIN: Well, I would hope so. Yes, I am. Two years ago, my 
engagement was on the state of Alaska, largest, most diverse state in the 
union. 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy coming 
from our state, desiring to and working towards ramping up that domestic energy 
production. That was my focus and now of course my focus has been enlarged. So I 
sure as heck better be more astute on these current events, national issues than 
I was two years ago.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><strong>Fact: 
<strong><strong>In 2005, Alaska produced only 3.5 percent of U.S. domestic 
energy production</strong></strong></strong></h2>

<p>Responding to Palin's September 2008 
statement that Alaska "produces nearly 20 
percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy," 
FactCheck.org <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.factcheck.org%2Felections-2008%2Fenergetically_wrong.html">wrote</a>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>It's simply 
untrue that Alaska produces anything close to 
20 percent of the U.S. "energy supply," a term that is 
generally defined as energy <em><em>consumed</em></em>. That category 
includes power produced in the U.S. by nuclear, coal, hydroelectric 
dams and other means&nbsp;- as well as all the oil imported into the country. 
</p>

<p>Palin would have been correct to say 
that Alaska produces just over 14 percent of 
all the <em><em>oil 
produced</em></em> in the U.S., leaving out imports and leaving 
out other forms of power. According to the federal government's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftonto.eia.doe.gov%2Fdnav%2Fpet%2Fpet_crd_crpdn_adc_mbbl_a.htm">Energy Information Administration</a>, Alaskan wells produced 
263.6 million barrels of oil in 2007, or 14.3 percent of the total 
U.S. production of 1.8 billion 
barrels.</p>

<p>But Alaskan production accounts for 
only 4.8 percent of all the crude oil and petroleum products <em><em>supplied</em></em> to 
the U.S. in 2007, counting both domestic 
production and imports from other nations. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftonto.eia.doe.gov%2Fdnav%2Fpet%2Fpet_sum_crdsnd_adc_mbbl_a.htm">According to EIA</a>, the total supply was just over 5.5 billion 
barrels in 2007.</p>

<p>Furthermore, Palin said "energy," 
not "oil," so she was actually much further off the mark. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eia.doe.gov%2Femeu%2Fstates%2Fsep_prod%2FP2%2FPDF%2FP2.pdf">According to EIA,</a> Alaska actually produced 2,417.1 trillion BTUs 
[British Thermal Units] of energy in 2005, the last year for which full state 
numbers are available. That's equal to just 3.5 percent of the country's 
domestic energy production. </p>

<p>And according to EIA analyst Paul 
Hess, that would calculate to only "2.4 percent of the 100,368.6 trillion BTUs 
the U.S. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eia.doe.gov%2Femeu%2Fstates%2Fhf.jsp%3Fincfile%3Dsep_sum%2Fplain_html%2Fsum_btu_tot.html">consumes</a>." </p>

<p>Palin didn't make clear whether she 
was talking about Alaska's share of all the 
energy produced in the U.S. or all the energy consumed here. 
Either way, she was wrong.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><strong>Fact: As of 2007, 
Alaska's share of U.S. energy 
production declined to 2.9 percent</strong></h2>

<p>According to the Energy Information 
Administration, the state of Alaska <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftonto.eia.doe.gov%2Fstate%2Fstate_energy_profiles.cfm%3Fsid%3DAK">produced</a> 
2,052 trillion BTUs of energy in 2007, 2.9 percent of total U.S. production. 
Further, the EIA <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftonto.eia.doe.gov%2Fstate%2Fstate_energy_rankings.cfm%3Fkeyid%3D89%26orderid%3D1">calculated</a> 
that Alaska 
ranked 11th in the country in total energy production.</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546399" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546399&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002070018</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002070018</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Palin's tea party speech full of false and misleading national security claims</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During her address before the National&nbsp;Tea Party Convention, Fox News contributor Sarah Palin made numerous false and misleading claims about national security and foreign policy, including suggesting that the Obama administration doesn't use the word&nbsp;"war,"&nbsp;that interrogators didn't ask alleged Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk&nbsp;Abdulmutallab about his training and future al Qaeda plots, and that&nbsp;Abdulmutallab has not provided information since he&nbsp;"lawyered up and invoked our U.S. constitutional right to remain silent." <br />
</p><h2><strong>CLAIM: 
Abdulmutallab</strong>&nbsp;<strong>"lawyered up and invoked our U.S. 
constitutional right to remain silent"</strong></h2>

<p>From Palin's February 7 National Tea 
Party Convention speech:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PALIN:<strong>&nbsp;</strong>What 
followed was equally disturbing after he was captured. He was questioned for 
only 50 minutes. We have a choice in how to do this. The choice was only 
question him for 50 minutes and then read his Miranda rights. The administration 
says then there are no downsides or upsides to treating terrorists like civilian 
criminal defendants. But a lot of us would beg to differ. For example, there are 
questions we would have liked this foreign terrorist to answer before he 
lawyered up and invoked our U.S. constitutional right to remain 
silent. [CNN Transcripts,&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftranscripts.cnn.com%2FTRANSCRIPTS%2F1002%2F06%2Fcnr.09.html">2/6/10</a>]</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>REALITY: Administration source reportedly says Abdulmutallab 
currently "cooperating," officials say he provided intelligence after being 
Mirandized.&nbsp;</strong>Responding to Senate Intelligence 
Committee chairwoman Sen. Diane Feinstein&nbsp;in a February 2 hearing (accessed via 
the Nexis database), FBI Director Robert Mueller agreed that "Abdulmutallab has provided 
valuable information" and that "the interrogation continues despite the fact 
that he has been Mirandized." Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair 
testified in the same hearing: "There are decisions that have to be made in 
which you balance the requirement for intelligence with the requirement for a 
prosecution and the sorts of pressure that you bring onto the people that you 
arrest in either form. It's got to be a decision made at the time. And I think 
the balance struck in the Mutallab was a very -- was an understandable balance. 
We got good intelligence, we're getting more." &nbsp;</p>

<p>Moreover, a February 2&nbsp;Reuters<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FidUSTRE61169J20100202%3FfeedType%3DRSS%26feedName%3DdomesticNews">article</a>&nbsp;reported&nbsp;"a law enforcement official['s]"&nbsp;comment 
that&nbsp;"Abdulmutallab is talking and has been talking since last week providing 
useful, actionable and current intelligence that we've been actively following 
up on." <em>The</em>&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;also 
reported:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>Umar Farouk 
Abdulmutallab, the Nigerian man accused of trying to blow up a jetliner bound 
for Detroit on Dec. 25, started talking to 
investigators after two of his family members arrived in the United States 
and helped earn his cooperation, a senior administration official said Tuesday 
evening.</p>

<p>Mr. Abdulmutallab, 23, began 
speaking to F.B.I. agents last week in Detroit and has not stopped, two government 
officials said. The officials declined to disclose what information was obtained 
from him, but said it was aiding in the investigation of the attempted terrorist 
attack.</p>

<p>"With the family, the F.B.I. 
approached the suspect," the senior administration official said, speaking to 
reporters at the White House on the condition of anonymity because of the 
pending legal case. "He has been cooperating for days." [<em>New 
York&nbsp;Times,&nbsp;</em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fus%2F03terror.html%3Fhp">2/2/10</a>]</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><strong>CLAIM: 
Abdulmutallab</strong>&nbsp;<strong>not interrogated about training and future 
plots</strong></h2>

<p>From Palin's February 7 National Tea 
Party Convention speech:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PALIN:<strong>&nbsp;</strong>There are 
questions that we would have liked answered before he lawyered up, like where 
exactly were you trained and by whom. You are bragging about all these other 
terrorists just like you, who are they? When and where will they try to strike 
next? [CNN Transcripts,&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftranscripts.cnn.com%2FTRANSCRIPTS%2F1002%2F06%2Fcnr.09.html">2/6/10</a>]</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>REALITY: 
Interrogators&nbsp;reportedly sought and received such&nbsp;information&nbsp;from 
Abdulmutallab.&nbsp;</strong>Appearing before 
the<strong>&nbsp;</strong>Senate 
Judiciary Committee on January 20, FBI Director Robert Mueller testified that 
interrogators interviewed Abdulmutallab "to gain intelligence, intelligence 
about whether there's another bomb, whether other coconspirators, where'd he get 
the bomb" (accessed via Nexis). Also,&nbsp;<em>Newsweek</em>'s Michael Isikoff&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.newsweek.com%2Fblogs%2Fdeclassified%2Farchive%2F2010%2F01%2F22%2Fdid-u-s-intel-officials-mislead-congress-about-christmas-day-bombing.aspx">reported</a>&nbsp;on 
his blog:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>While at the hospital, he was 
interrogated for "about an hour" by veteran FBI agents with the bureau's Joint 
Terrorist Task Force in Detroit. During that hour, one official said, 
the agents learned a wealth of information from Abdulmutallab about his 
connections to Al Qaeda; who he met with in Yemen; where he got the bomb that was sewn into 
his underwear; and "who trained him in Yemen." Added another official: "We 
got a lot of leads." </p>
</blockquote>

<p>The&nbsp;Associated Press&nbsp;similarly&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.miamiherald.com%2Fbusiness%2Fnation%2Fstory%2F1444598.html">reported</a>: 
"Shortly after 3:30 p.m., FBI agents began interviewing the suspect in his 
hospital room, joined by a CBP officer&nbsp;and&nbsp;an Immigration&nbsp;and&nbsp;Customs 
Enforcement agent. The suspect spoke openly, said one official, talking in 
detail about what he'd done&nbsp;and&nbsp;the planning that went into the attack. Other 
counterterrorism officials speaking on condition of anonymity said it was during 
this questioning that he admitted he had been trained&nbsp;and&nbsp;instructed in the plot 
by al-Qaida operatives in Yemen."</p>
<h2><strong>CLAIM: Obama 
administration uses "words like 'overseas contingency operation' instead of the 
word 'war' "</strong></h2>

<p>From Palin's February 7 National Tea 
Party Convention speech:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PALIN: Let me say, too, it's not 
politicizing our security to discuss our concerns because Americans deserve to 
know the truth about the threats that we face and what the administration is or 
isn't doing about them. So let's talk about them. New terms used like "overseas 
contingency operation" instead of the word "war." That reflects a world view 
that is out of touch with the enemy that we face. We can't spin our way out of 
this threat. It is one thing to call a pay raise a job created or saved. It is 
quite another to call the devastation that a homicide bomber can inflict a 
"manmade disaster." I just say, come on, Washington, if no where else, national 
security, that is one place where you've got to call it like it is. [CNN 
Transcripts,&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftranscripts.cnn.com%2FTRANSCRIPTS%2F1002%2F06%2Fcnr.09.html">2/6/10</a>]</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>REALITY: Obama 
has repeatedly used the word "war."&nbsp;</strong>President<strong>&nbsp;</strong>Obama used the word "war"&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201001280034">at least seven 
times</a>&nbsp;during his January 27 State of the Union speech. 
Moreover, following Obama's January 7 remarks on the attempted Christmas Day 
bombing of a Northwest Airlines flight -- remarks during which Obama stated, "We 
are at war. We are at war with al Qaeda" -- numerous conservative media 
figures&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201001080021">falsely 
suggested</a>&nbsp;that prior to that speech, Obama had not 
characterized the fight against terrorists as a war. In fact, in his inaugural 
address, Obama stated that "[o]ur nation is at 
war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred," and he has 
repeatedly discussed terrorism as the rationale for U.S. military 
action abroad.</p>
<h2><strong>CLAIM: "Our 
president spent a year reaching out to hostile regimes, writing personal letters 
to dangerous dictators"</strong></h2>

<p>From Palin's February 7 National Tea 
Party Convention speech:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PALIN: It's that same kind of 
misguided thinking that is seen throughout the administration's foreign policy 
decisions. Our president spent a year reaching out to hostile regimes, writing 
personal letters to dangerous dictators and apologizing for America, and 
what do we have to show for that? Here's what we have to show. 
North 
Korea tested nuclear weapons and longer-range 
ballistic missiles. [CNN Transcripts,&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftranscripts.cnn.com%2FTRANSCRIPTS%2F1002%2F06%2Fcnr.09.html">2/6/10</a>]</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>REALITY: Bush, 
Clinton also 
wrote personal appeals to North Korean leader.&nbsp;</strong>A December 6, 2007, 
Associated Press article&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fnews%2Fwashington%2F2007-12-06-bush-letter_N.htm">reported</a>, 
"President Bush's personal letter to North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, raising 
the possibility of normalized relations if he fully discloses his nuclear 
programs by year's end, is a turnabout for a president who has labeled the 
communist regime part of an 'axis of evil.' " AP further reported that the 
letter "reflected how U.S. policy toward the nation has 
shifted from the days when Bush shunned the dictator." Also, a May 27, 1999, 
Associated Press article&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalpolicy.org%2Fcomponent%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F202%2F42408.html">reported</a>, 
"North 
Korea's leader, Kim Jong Il, received a letter 
on Wednesday from President Clinton brought by a special envoy to the isolated 
Communist country, the official North Korean news agency reported. The envoy, 
William Perry, delivered the letter through Kim Yong Nam, head of North 
Korea's legislative Supreme People's Assembly, according to 
the Korean Central News Agency, which was monitored in Seoul."</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546400" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546400&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F201002070017</link>
      <guid>http://mediamatters.org/research/201002070017</guid>
      <source url="http://mediamatters.org/rss/research.rss">Media Matters for America - Research Items</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Palin says she’s fine with Limbaugh’s use of the ‘r-word.’</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This morning on Fox News, host Chris Wallace asked Sarah Palin about her public call for White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel to resign after reports surfaced that he called a group of liberal activists “f—ing retarded.” Palin reiterated her call for Emanuel to &#8220;step down&#8221; and explained that while she&#8217;s not &#8220;politically correct&#8221; [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493546420" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/07/palin-r-word/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493546420&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2010%2F02%2F07%2Fpalin-r-word%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>This morning on Fox News, host Chris Wallace asked Sarah Palin about her public call for White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/03/limbaugh-palin-apologize/">to resign</a> after reports surfaced that he called a group of liberal activists “<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703808904575025030384695158.html">f—ing retarded</a>.” Palin reiterated her call for Emanuel to &#8220;step down&#8221; and explained that while she&#8217;s not &#8220;politically correct&#8221; or &#8220;one to be a word police,&#8221; she was committed to &#8220;reaching out and to helping the special needs community.&#8221; But when Wallace asked Palin about <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/03/limbaugh-palin-apologize/">Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s endorsement of the language</a>, Palin said she was fine with Limbaugh&#8217;s satirical comments. &#8220;I didn&#8217;t hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with &#8216;f-ing retards,&#8217;&#8221; she said. &#8220;There is a big difference there”:</p>
<blockquote><p>PALIN: <strong>I agree with Rush Limbaugh. He was using satire to politically correct</strong> &#8212; </p>
<p>WALLACE: He used the &#8220;r&#8221; word. </p>
<p>PALIN: He used satire. Name-calling by anyone, I teach this to my children and you teach it to your children and grandchildren, too. Name calling by anyone is just unnecessary. It just wastes time. Let&#8217;s speak to the issues and &#8212; [...]</p>
<p>PALIN: <strong>I didn&#8217;t hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with &#8216;f-ing retards&#8217; and we did know that Rahm Emanuel has been reported, did say that. there is a big difference there</strong>. Again, name-calling, using language that is insensitive, by anyone, male, female, Republican, Democrat, is unnecessary. It&#8217;s inappropriate. Let&#8217;s all just grow up. </p></blockquote>
<p>Watch it:</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="240"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hv2G90Xoqu0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hv2G90Xoqu0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="240"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Emanuel, who has <a href="http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/01/28/emanuel/6781/">apologized for the remark</a> to Special Olympics CEO Tim Shriver, now plans to host “<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/02/emanuel-steps-up-his-apology/">a delegation of advocates</a>, including two people with mental disabilities, at the White House” as part of his effort to make amends. Limbaugh, meanwhile, gleefully used a derivative of the word &#8220;retard&#8221; <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/04/palin-limbaugh-demeaning/">at least forty times</a>, saying that &#8220;there’s going to be a retard summit at the White House. Much like the beer summit between Obama and Gates and that cop in Cambridge.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Think Fast</category>
      <guid>http://thinkprogress.org/?p=81236</guid>
      <source url="http://thinkprogress.org/feed/">Think Progress</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Igor]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right Wing Media's Lie Machine</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0 10px 5px 0;"><object width="220" height="344"><br />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Audjt-Y6xWw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Audjt-Y6xWw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="220" height="200"></embed></object></div>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Audjt-Y6xWw" title="reference on video" target="_blank">video</a> posted on YouTube on February 3, House Representative <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barney_Frank" title="reference on Barney Frank" target="_self">Barney Frank</a> (D-Massachusetts) explains how the right wing media machine creates and spreads <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=disinformation" title="reference on disinformation" target="_self">disinformation</a> in an effort to smear the left. "Disinformation" should not be confused with "misinformation," the unintentional form of wrong information. <em>Disinformation</em> is produced by people who intend to mislead their audience. </p>
<h2>Step 1: Fabricate the Lie</h2>
<p>Frank tells how <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_Fund" title="reference on John Fund" target="_self">John Fund</a>, an editorial writer for the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, told a lie about him in November of last year: In a speech at a conservative function in Florida called <a href="http://www.campaignsolutions.com/fpm/restoration/" title="reference on "Restoration Weekend" target="_blank">"Restoration Weekend</a>," Fund claimed that, after losing the special election in Massachusetts, Democrats <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Chuck_Schumer" title="reference on Chuck Schumer" target="_self">Chuck Schumer</a> and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barney_Frank" title="reference on Barney Frank" target="_self">Barney Frank</a> were going to propose a bill to create universal voter registration. Fund further stated that Democrats were going to add all welfare recipients and unemployed people to the voter rolls, and he called it "felon re-enfranchisement." </p>
<p>In reality, Frank explains, there was no such bill.
</p><p><a href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/8882">read more</a></p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581553" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8882#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:41:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581553&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8882</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/67">media</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8882 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Anne Landman]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judd Gregg: "The law is very clear! 'The monies recouped from the TARP shall be paid into the general fund of the treasury for the reduction of the public debt.'"</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: True  |   Gregg claims that TARP money must be used to pay down the deficit
<br/>
<p>President Barack Obama has proposed a boost for small businesses, but Sen. Judd Gregg isn't hot on the idea.In a hearing about the administration's latest budget, Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, criticized the White House for proposing to use funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, an initiative originally intended to keep the banking system from collapsing, to help community banks lend to small businesses. Gregg said it violates TARP rules."The whole concept of the TARP was that as we recoup the money ... and as we recoup that money, we would use it to pay ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/05/judd-gregg/gregg-claims-tarp-money-must-be-used-pay-down-defi/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509776" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509776&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F05%2Fjudd-gregg%2Fgregg-claims-tarp-money-must-be-used-pay-down-defi%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/05/judd-gregg/gregg-claims-tarp-money-must-be-used-pay-down-defi/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barack Obama: Some Republicans who voted against the stimulus "have been all too happy to claim credit for Recovery Act projects and the jobs those projects have produced. They come to the ribbon cuttings."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: True  |   Obama criticizes Republicans who opposed stimulus, then claim credit for projects it funded
<br/>
<p>Twice recently, President Barack Obama has slammed congressional Republicans for voting against his economic stimulus bill in February 2009 but later touting provisions of the bill that benefited their own constituents. During his Jan. 29, 2010, question-and-answer session with House Republican lawmakers in Baltimore, Obama brought up the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, as the stimulus is officially known: "There was an interesting headline in CNN today: 'Americans disapprove of stimulus, but like every policy in it.' And there was a poll that showed that if you broke it down into its component parts, 80 percent approved of the tax ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/05/barack-obama/obama-criticizes-republicans-who-opposed-stimulus-/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509777" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:17:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F05%2Fbarack-obama%2Fobama-criticizes-republicans-who-opposed-stimulus-%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/05/barack-obama/obama-criticizes-republicans-who-opposed-stimulus-/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNN: Secretary Duncan Right to Celebrate Katrina</title>
      <description><![CDATA[At the end of January, Obama education secretary Arne Duncan told a cable news show (TV One's Washington Watch, 1/31/10),  "I think the best thing that happened to the education system in New Orleans was Hurricane Katrina." In reporting on Duncan's remarks, the January 30 Washington Post apparently couldn't find anyone to challenge the notion [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=492086058" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/02/05/cnn-secretary-duncan-right-to-celebrate-katrina/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:52:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=492086058&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fair.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F05%2Fcnn-secretary-duncan-right-to-celebrate-katrina%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>At the end of January, Obama education secretary Arne Duncan told a cable news show (<strong>TV One</strong>'s <strong>Washington Watch</strong>, 1/31/10),  "I think the best thing that happened to the education system in New Orleans was Hurricane Katrina." In reporting on Duncan's remarks, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR2010012903259.html">January 30</a> <strong>Washington Post</strong> apparently couldn't find anyone to challenge the notion that Katrina was a good thing.</p>
<p><strong>CNN</strong> aired a segment<a href="http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1001/30/cnr.01.html"> the same day</a> featuring guests Roland Martin, a <strong>CNN</strong> regular and the host of <strong>Washington Watch</strong>, the <strong></strong>program where Duncan made the remarks in question; and <strong>CNN</strong> education contributor Steve Perry, a magnet school founder, champion of vouchers and all-around public school critic.</p>
<p>Martin applauded the progress New Orleans public schools have made, citing improving test scores. But Perry, who said he agreed with Duncan, went much further, sounding frankly unhinged as he actually lamented that there could not be more Katrinas for the sake of U.S. education: "I'm saying that we can't have a Katrina in all of the 50 states."</p>
<p>Nowhere in the <strong>CNN</strong> segment or the <strong>Washington Post </strong>report was there anyone to challenge Duncan's remarks or to explain that the reason New Orleans test scores have increased is that post-Katrina rebuilding has largely driven out the poor and black populations who had been so poorly served by the city's schools pre-Katrina.</p>
<p>All in all, it was education coverage designed to make you dumber.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Media Criticism</category>
      <guid>http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13642</guid>
      <source url="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/">FAIR Blog</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Steve Rendall]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barney Frank on the 'Right-Wing Propaganda Machine'</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Here's a classic example of how the conservative media smear machine works. In a video less than four minutes long, Rep. Barney Frank describes how the Wall Street Journal's John Fund lied about him, how that lie was amplified by the right's media echo chamber, and how, when he called Fund on the lie, Fund [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=492086059" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/02/05/barney-frank-on-the-right-wing-propaganda-machine/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=492086059&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fair.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F05%2Fbarney-frank-on-the-right-wing-propaganda-machine%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Here's a classic example of how the conservative media smear machine works. In a <a href=":  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Audjt-Y6xWw">video</a> less than four minutes long, Rep. Barney Frank describes how the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong>'s John Fund lied about him, how that lie was amplified by the right's media echo chamber, and how, when he called Fund on the lie, Fund admitted he was wrong, but refused to retract.</p>
<p>The following is a transcript of Frank's February 3 remarks from the floor of the House of Representatives:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Speaker, I recently got some first-hand experience with the way in which the right-wing propaganda machine operates.  The pattern appears to be to begin with a lie and then have that lie multiply through an echo chamber that repeats it and repeats it.  In this case, a man named John Fund, who is an editorial writer at the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong>, one of the most right-wing of our publications these days on the editorial page, just told a lie about me in November of last year.</p>
<p>He gave a <a title="Media Matters: Right-wing media ran with Fund's made-up claim that Rep. Frank was planning universal voter registration" href="http://mediamatters.org/print/research/201001200015" target="_blank">speech</a> at Restoration Weekend--I don’t know what they were restoring, but it certainly wasn’t respect for the truth--and he said that: "Democrats were rattled by the November 3 election results.  What do liberals do when they lose an election? They change the rules.  In January, Chuck Schumer and Barney Frank will propose universal voter registration."  It'll be "felon re-enfranchisement."  "The feds will tell the states, 'Take everyone on every list of welfare recipients you have, everyone on every list of unemployed you have.'"</p>
<p>It's a lie; he made it up.  Its not even a misinterpretation, it's not a quote taken out of context, it is a total myth.  There is no such bill. There wasn't in November.  But then the right-wing echo chamber picks it up.  The <strong>Washington Times</strong>, the voice of the Reverend Moon, <a title="Washington Times: Letting crooks &amp; illegals vote" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/07/letting-crooks-illegals-vote/?feat=home_top5_shared" target="_blank">says</a>, "Schumer and Frank have plans to ram through legislation that will produce universal voter registration," and they say "It'll be on the floor of the house in two weeks."  It's the lie repeated.</p>
<p>Glenn Beck joined in, Rush Limbaugh joined in.  This begins with a totally fictional accusation by John Fund with no basis whatsoever. It is then repeated by Glenn Beck, and repeated by the <strong>Washington Times</strong> and repeated by Rush Limbaugh.  None of them having checked what we were talking about.  None of them seeing if it was accurate.  I was asked by the <strong>Situation Room</strong>, why I had done that?  My response was: "Done what? I didn’t do it."  So I checked in on it, I found that the source of this was Mr. Fund's totally irresponsible myth in November.</p>
<p>So I wrote to Mr. Fund and I will put this letter in there, and said, "I was puzzled to have you say this, I checked, I now write to tell you that you are entirely wrong in your assertion about me and in the absence of your being able to show any basis in which you made such a statement, to ask you to acknowledge that fact."</p>
<p>He's not only a liar, he's a coward.  He wouldn't do it.  My staff member, Mr. [Harry] Gural, asked him, called him up and said, "Well, what was this based on?"</p>
<p>He said, "I made a mistake."</p>
<p>"Well, have you issued a retraction?"  Mr. Gural asked him.</p>
<p>"Oh, yeah," he said.</p>
<p>"Can we see a copy?" Mr. Gural reasonably asked.</p>
<p>"Oh, I, uh, told a couple of people."</p>
<p>So here we are.  Mr. Fund makes it up.  It's a lie.  It's a myth.  There was nothing there and it's to discredit all Democrats, his right cohorts then echo it and echo it.  The next you know, it's going to be coming on the floor of the House in two weeks and people will hear it and it's all over the blogs: "This is the Democrats' disregard for the electoral process."</p>
<p>And when we call Mr. Fund's attention to the fact that this was a lie, what does he say?  "Whoops."  But he's not going to tell anybody about it.</p>
<p>Mr. Speaker, this is not the only case of this. And I know this has happened before, but because I was directly involved here, I am in a position to document this.</p>
<p>It begins with a lie from this editorial writer from the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong>, it is then a lie repeated by all of his right-wing colleagues and then when he is nailed in the lie, he simply blithely refuses to do anything about it.  I hope people will take from this  the lesson to be very skeptical when these right-wing propagandists, Limbaugh or Beck or the <strong>Washington Times</strong> or the <strong>Wall Street Journal</strong> editorial board, propagate these vicious smears.</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Politics</category>
      <guid>http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13637</guid>
      <source url="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/">FAIR Blog</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Steve Rendall]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ron Paul: "The money supply has doubled in the last year."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: Barely True  |   Ron Paul claims money supply has doubled
<br/>
<p>Joining the chorus of critics of Washington's handling of the economy, Rep. Ron Paul used a Jan. 26, 2010, column on his Web site to criticize the Federal Reserve:"We have been on a disastrous course for a long time. The money supply has doubled in the last year, our debt is unsustainable, the value of the dollar is going to continue its drop, and those Americans who understand where we are headed feel helpless and held hostage by foolish policymakers in Washington," wrote Paul, a Texas Republican who ran for president in 2008.We were ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/05/ron-paul/ron-paul-claims-money-supply-has-doubled/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509778" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:26:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509778&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F05%2Fron-paul%2Fron-paul-claims-money-supply-has-doubled%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/05/ron-paul/ron-paul-claims-money-supply-has-doubled/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Megabankers "Educate" Hill Staffers on Writing Financial Rules</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Last September, when President <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama" title="reference on Barack Obama" target="_self">Barack Obama</a> gave a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125292937349508441.html" title="reference on major speech on Wall Street" target="_blank">major speech on Wall Street</a> urging bankers to support financial reform, the CEOs of the nation's megabanks didn't bother to show up -- a move widely interpreted as a sign of disrespect. But those same CEOs found time to get to Capitol Hill to attend a two-day <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/2010-financial-services-university-fsu-educational-series-–-february-4-5-2010" title="reference on "Financial Services University"" target="_blank">"Financial Services University"</a> for the 20-something congressional aides who will be helping write the rules designed to rein in and reform Wall Street. The instructional seminar was organized by the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Financial_Services_Roundtable" title="reference on Financial Services Roundtable" target="_self">Financial Services Roundtable</a>, a powerful lobbying group for the finance industry. Many of the staffers in attendance were barely out of college, but they will soon be a position to help draft  new rules that will govern how the megabanks can make their money. Richard Davis, CEO of <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=U.S._Bancorp" title="reference on U.S. Bancorp" target="_self">U.S. Bancorp</a> attended, as did Robert Kelly, CEO of the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bank_of_New_York" title="reference on Bank of New York" target="_self">Bank of New York</a>, who told the staffers that bankers support reducing the number of regulators watching the industry. (Kelly told the group the U.S. has "zillions.") The CEOs did not mention the factors that led to the liquidity crunch, like the sky-high leveraged bets made possible by the lack of regulation, or how their actions blew up the economy and nearly destroyed the financial system. Instead, they talked about how the recently-passed credit card reform measures will hurt their companies. Nor did Kelly or Davis mention that the $800 million in revenue they'll miss after the rules go into effect is money they were taking from average Americans through unfair overdraft charges and predatory fees.
</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581554" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8881#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581554&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8881</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/726">banking</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8881 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Anne Landman]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Krugman and Media Deficit Hawks</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The fact that Paul Krugman writes columns for the New York Times means that the paper's readers are occasionally treated to a good media criticism--like today (2/5/10). He writes:
These days it's hard to pick up a newspaper or turn on a news program without encountering stern warnings about the federal budget deficit. The deficit threatens [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=492086060" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/02/05/krugman-and-media-deficit-hawks/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=492086060&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fair.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F05%2Fkrugman-and-media-deficit-hawks%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Paul Krugman writes columns for the <strong>New York Times</strong> means that the paper's readers are occasionally treated to a good media criticism--like today (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/opinion/05krugman.html?ref=opinion">2/5/10</a>). He writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>These days it's hard to pick up a newspaper or turn on a news program without encountering stern warnings about the federal budget deficit. The deficit threatens economic recovery, we’re told; it puts American economic stability at risk; it will undermine our influence in the world. These claims generally aren’t stated as opinions, as views held by some analysts but disputed by others. Instead, they’re reported as if they were facts, plain and simple.</p></blockquote>
<p>And the reality:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let's talk for a moment about budget reality. Contrary to what you often hear, the large deficit the federal government is running right now isn’t the result of runaway spending growth. Instead, well more than half of the deficit was caused by the ongoing economic crisis, which has led to a plunge in tax receipts, required federal bailouts of financial institutions, and been met--appropriately--with temporary measures to stimulate growth and support employment.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is important--especially when compared to news stories that tell you things like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>--"Independent voters in particular are uneasy about a tide of red ink in the wake of the billion-dollar packages for Wall Street, automakers and stimulus spending." (<strong>USA Today</strong>, <a href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20100203/indies03_st.art.htm&quot;&gt; ">2/3/10</a>)</p>
<p>--"Deficit spending, in turn, has caused the nation's accumulated debt to swell to dangerous levels." (<strong>Washington Post</strong>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/19/AR2010011903310.html">1/20/10</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Or the <strong>ABC World News</strong> report (2/1/10) that attempted to explain the deficit by focusing on the meaning of a billion: "And when we start tossing around a billion, it's a huge number. Just think, a billion hours ago, we were in the Stone Age." Well, <em>that </em>clarifies things.</p>
<p>For more media criticism on the deficit, see <strong>Extra!</strong>: "The Deficit Distraction: Media Push Spending Cuts Over Stimulus" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3888">9/09</a>) by Veronica Cassidy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Economy</category>
      <guid>http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13633</guid>
      <source url="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/">FAIR Blog</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Peter Hart]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dana Milbank Misses the Mythical John McCain</title>
      <description><![CDATA["I miss John McCain," writes the Washington Post's Dana Milbank today (2/5/10). Milbank calls himself "an original McCainiac"-- by which he means that he, like so many others in the corporate media, adored the so-called "maverick" John McCain of the 2000 presidential campaign.
As we've pointed out plenty of times before, McCain's Senate record has staunchly conservative throughout his career--except for [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=492086061" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/02/05/dana-milbank-misses-the-mythical-john-mccain/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=492086061&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fair.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F05%2Fdana-milbank-misses-the-mythical-john-mccain%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>"I miss John McCain," writes the <strong>Washington Post</strong>'s Dana Milbank today (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/04/AR2010020404307_pf.html">2/5/10</a>). Milbank calls himself "an original McCainiac"-- by which he means that he, like so many others in the corporate media, adored the so-called "maverick" John McCain of the 2000 presidential campaign.</p>
<p>As we've pointed out <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3369">plenty</a> of times <a href="http://www.fair.org/blog/2009/01/23/the-myth-is-back/">before</a>, McCain's Senate record has staunchly conservative throughout his career--except for those anomalous years, just before and after his unsuccessful bid for the 2000 Republican presidential nomination, when the press mostly fell in love with him. Wishing for<em> that</em> McCain to return is akin to wishing that politician would just lie to you one more time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Politics</category>
      <guid>http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13630</guid>
      <source url="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/">FAIR Blog</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Peter Hart]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Groundhogs Day on Wall Street</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On the day that Punxsutawney Phil emerged to predict a long hard winter, Americans picked up the newspaper  to read that <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=AIG" title="reference on AIG" target="_self">AIG</a>, the bankrupt insurance  giant, was going to pay out $100 million in bonuses to its failed financial products division. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Kenneth_Feinberg" title="reference on Kenneth Feinberg" target="_self">Kenneth Feinberg</a>, President Obama’s pay czar, announced that these were “grandfathered” retention payments and that the unit had taken a $20 million dollar reduction in bonuses. </p>
<p>Like Bill Murray in the classic film Groundhog Day, we are being forced to live this day over again.
</p><p><a href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/8880">read more</a></p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581555" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8880#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581555&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8880</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/726">banking</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8880 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Mary Bottari]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Colorado court says shield law protects unaired Dateline footage</title>
      <description><![CDATA[A Colorado district court has denied an insurance marketing company's motion to compel NBC's Dateline to hand over unaired camera footage.
Insurance marketer Brokers' Choice of America sued NBC and . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598599" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598599&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11252</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11252</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas attorney general says no constitutional rights for cities</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Four Texas cities that filed a federal lawsuit claiming that the state's open meetings law infringes on their right to free speech must withdraw as plaintiffs because government agencies cannot have . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598600" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598600&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11251</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wisconsin committee passes bill restricting access to court records</title>
      <description><![CDATA[A Wisconsin state assembly committee has passed a bill that would restrict public online access to court records, WQOW (Eau Claire) reported.
The proposed bill limits public access to cases where . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598601" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598601&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11250</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11250</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kansas high court allows reporter subpoena to stand</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Kansas Supreme Court yesterday ruled that prosecutors may force Dodge City Globe reporter Claire O&rsquo;Brien to testify about her news gathering activities and materials in a murder . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598602" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598602&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11249</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11249</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kentucky's Senate passes two transparency bills</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Kentucky Senate unanimously passed two bills today that would require all government agencies -- including public colleges and universities --  to disclose financial data online, The Kentucky . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598603" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598603&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11248</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11248</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>D.C. Circuit temporarily prevents release of Blackwater papers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., has temporarily blocked the release of sealed court documents in the government's case against Blackwater security guards charged with killing Iraqi . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598604" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598604&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11247</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11247</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Penn. county orders dog license info released, with exceptions</title>
      <description><![CDATA[A county in Pennsylvania plans to appeal a binding decision made by the state&rsquo;s open government office last week that ordered the release of names and addresses of county dog owners, unless . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598605" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598605&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11246</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11246</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ohio judge postpones trial pending high court decision</title>
      <description><![CDATA[An Ohio judge has postponed the trial of a woman charged in the death of her infant daughter until the state Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of his order barring prohibiting media . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598606" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598606&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11245</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11245</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Hampshire Supreme Court extends Right-to-Know Law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The New Hampshire Supreme Court on Friday unanimously supported the state's Right-to-Know Law and ordered a private organization that represents public agencies to release its salary information, The . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598607" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598607&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11244</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11244</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State high court suspends prior restraint on news coverage</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Ohio Supreme Court has temporarily lifted a judge's order that would have barred journalists from reporting on a public trial that begins next week. The stay, issued after the Toledo Blade . . .<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=491598608" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:42:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=491598608&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcfp.org%2Fnewsitems%2Findex.php%3Fi%3D11243</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11243</guid>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ReportersCommitteeNews/">Reporters Committee News</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barack Obama: "We're also cutting a Forest Service economic development program that strayed so far from any mission that it funded a music festival."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: Barely True  |   Obama proposed to ax budget of Forest Service program that veered so far astray, it funded a music festival
<br/>
<p>In remarks after unveiling his proposed 2011 budget on Feb. 1, President Barack Obama spoke of the need to rein in spending by cutting "what doesn't work to pay for what does." Obama boasted that the administration has gone through every department's spending "line by line" looking for "inefficiency, duplication and programs that have outlived their usefulness." Last year, he said, the administration found $17 billion in cuts; and "this year, we've already found $20 billion."And then Obama threw out a few "commonsense" examples:"We cut $115 million from a program that pays states to clean up ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/04/barack-obama/obama-proposed-axe-budget-forest-service-program-v/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509779" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509779&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F04%2Fbarack-obama%2Fobama-proposed-axe-budget-forest-service-program-v%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/04/barack-obama/obama-proposed-axe-budget-forest-service-program-v/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John McCain: On whether he supports 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: Full Flop  |   McCain flips on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'
<br/>
<p>The military's controversial "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy is back in the spotlight after President Barack Obama pledged to repeal it in his State of the Union speech.On the campaign trail, Obama frequently attacked the policy, which prohibits gays and lesbians from openly serving in the military. His opponent Sen. John McCain signaled he was open to changing the policy, but made it conditional to what military leaders wanted. Here's what he had to say about the issue back in 2006:"I listen to people like Gen. Colin Powell, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/04/john-mccain/mccain-flips-dont-ask-dont-tell/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509780" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:06:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509780&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F04%2Fjohn-mccain%2Fmccain-flips-dont-ask-dont-tell%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/04/john-mccain/mccain-flips-dont-ask-dont-tell/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paul Krugman: The Senate-passed health care bill "is identical to the Massachusetts health care plan -- the same thing."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: Mostly True  |   Krugman calls Senate health care bill similar to law in Massachusetts
<br/>
<p>The recent Massachusetts Senate election captivated Americans far beyond the Bay State. In that contest, Republican Scott Brown picked up a seat formerly held by the late Democratic giant Edward Kennedy. Brown's upset victory was aided by a wave of frustration over how Congress and President Barack Obama have been handling health care reform legislation.During the campaign, Brown said that if he was elected, he would become the 41st Republican senator, enabling the GOP to block the Democratic majority from reaching the 60-vote threshold required to pass key legislation, including a health care bill. The Senate has already ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/04/paul-krugman/krugman-calls-senate-health-care-bill-similar-law-/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509781" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509781&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F04%2Fpaul-krugman%2Fkrugman-calls-senate-health-care-bill-similar-law-%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/04/paul-krugman/krugman-calls-senate-health-care-bill-similar-law-/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Louisiana Race for Coroner Produces Wacked-Out Campaign Ad</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<div style="float:left;margin:0 10px 5px 0;"><object width="220" height="200"><br />
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oRgCOXaiDjQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oRgCOXaiDjQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="220" height="200"></embed></object></div>
<p>The political race between two doctors duking it out for the elective office of Parish Coroner in New Orleans has resulted in arguably the weirdest  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRgCOXaiDjQ" title="reference on political campaign ad" target="_blank">political campaign ad</a> in history. The incumbent is Dr. Frank Minyard, who is running for a tenth term after serving 36 years in the office, and the challenger is Dr. Dwight McKenna, a convicted tax evader who spent nine months in federal prison for underreporting his income by $367,000 in 1992. Dr. McKenna has launched a campaign ad against Dr. Minyard that highlights a mini-scandal that occurred in the 1990s, after Minyard was sued for allegedly removing pieces of bone and corneas from bodies and sending them to transplant centers without permission. The ad portrays Dr. Minyard as a mad, Frankenstein-style doctor in surgeon's garb, complete with a bloody hand-print on the back of his white coat. He and his assistant, Igor, hover ghoulishly over a dead body that bears a toe tag that says "DOA" on one side and "For Sale" on the other. Dr. Minyard carelessly waves around what looks like a rubbery calf's liver, and tells Igor that they need to retrieve a heart, a spleen and a liver "for tonight's sale." Igor sneers, "Ye-s-s-s, Dr. Minyard," and a deep voice-over intones, "Say NO to Dr. Minyard, and YES to Dr. McKenna."
</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581556" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8878#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581556&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8878</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/119">advertising</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8878 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Anne Landman]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Boehner: Prolonged Health Bill Debate Hurts the Economy (Leaves Out GOP's Strategy to Stall it)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>House Minority Leader <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_Boehner" title="reference on John Boehner" target="_self">John Boehner</a> (R-Ohio) <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/79583-boehner-drawn-out-health-debate-has-hurt-the-economy" title="reference on suggested" target="_blank">suggested</a> on <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fox_News" title="reference on Fox News" target="_self">Fox News</a> that the drawn-out process of passing health reform legislation is hurting the economy. Boehner told Fox News, “It’s the policies that are coming out of this administration and liberals here in Congress that are holding back employers ... And until there’s some certainty out there in the marketplace … I expect them to continue to sit on their hands.” Boehner left out information that Republicans have adopted a strategy to kill the bill by delaying it as much as possible. On December 1, 2009 Senator <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Judd_Gregg" title="reference on Judd Gregg" target="_self">Judd Gregg</a> (R-New Hampshire) sent a <a href="http://www.politico.com/static/PPM110_091202_minorityrights.html" title="reference on letter" target="_blank">letter</a> to all Republican senators listing procedural stall tactics, and on December 10, 2009, CBS News obtained a <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12/10/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5962642.shtml" title="reference on strategy memo" target="_blank">strategy memo</a> issued by <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Republican_National_Committee" title="reference on Republican National Committee" target="_self">Republican National Committee</a> chair <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Michael_Steele" title="reference on Michael Steele" target="_self">Michael Steele</a> that urged Republicans to do everything in their power to block the health care bill from advancing in the Senate: "I urge everyone to spend every bit of capital and energy you have to stop this health care reform,"  Steele wrote in the memo. "The Democrats have accused us of trying to delay, stall, slow down and stop this bill. They are right. We do want to delay, stall, slow down and ultimately stop them from experimenting on our nation's health care."
</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581557" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8877#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:56:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581557&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8877</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/67">media</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8877 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Anne Landman]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hearts, Minds, and the Satellite Dish</title>
      <description><![CDATA[CAIRO—The United States government has on occasion distressed over the nature of TV news in the Arab world and its perceived negative effect on public attitudes toward America. During the Bush years, American officials repeatedly criticized Al-Jazeera for inciting anti-Americanism, and for its alleged flirtations with Al-Qaeda. In 2004, the United States launched its own Arabic news channel, Al-Hurra, to...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330270" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:01:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330270&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fcampaign_desk%2Fhearts_minds_and_the_satellite.php</link>
      <category>Campaign Desk</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/hearts_minds_and_the_satellite.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scott Brown: "Federal employees are making twice as much as their private counterparts."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: False  |   In PolitiFact debut, Brown says federal jobs pay twice as much as private sector jobs
<br/>
<p>Only 12 days after his upset victory in Massachusetts, Republican Sen.-elect Scott Brown made his debut on the Sunday morning talk circuit.He talked about health care, the war in Afghanistan and deficit reduction in an interview with Barbara Walters on the Jan. 31, 2010 episode of This Week. Brown encouraged President Barack Obama to put a freeze on federal position hires and raises because, "as you know, federal employees are making twice as much as their private counterparts."Federal jobs don't exactly have a reputation for bringing in big bucks, so we were curious about ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/03/scott-brown/politifact-debut-brown-says-federal-jobs-pay-twice/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509782" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:48:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509782&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F03%2Fscott-brown%2Fpolitifact-debut-brown-says-federal-jobs-pay-twice%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/03/scott-brown/politifact-debut-brown-says-federal-jobs-pay-twice/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Glenn Beck: "Thomas Jefferson created the Marines for the Islamic pirates that were happening."</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Truth-o-Meter says: Half-True  |   Beck claims Marines were created by Thomas Jefferson to combat Islamic pirates
<br/>
<p>On his Fox News program on Jan. 29, 2010, Glenn Beck was providing a history lesson on progressives in U.S. politics when he made the point that the difference between progressives and the Founding Fathers is that the founders thought the United States "should be Switzerland. We should stay out of everybody's business, be friends with everybody.""I mean, if you're going to mess with us, we're going to pound you," Beck said. "Thomas Jefferson created the Marines for the Islamic pirates that were happening, right?" One of the panelists on the show agreed with him, and Beck continued: ...</p> <a href="/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/03/glenn-beck/beck-claims-marines-were-created-thomas-jefferson-/">>> More</a><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493509783" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493509783&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ftruth-o-meter%2Fstatements%2F2010%2Ffeb%2F03%2Fglenn-beck%2Fbeck-claims-marines-were-created-thomas-jefferson-%2F</link>
      <guid>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/03/glenn-beck/beck-claims-marines-were-created-thomas-jefferson-/</guid>
      <source url="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/feeds/statements/">Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Golden Throne Award Goes to Tim Ryan, Spinmeister for U.S. Securities Industry</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="inline right"><img src="/files/images/golden_throne-ryan2.jpg" width="180" height="263" align="right" alt="T. Timothy Ryan, Jr." /></span>The <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Center_for_Media_and_Democracy" title="reference on Center for Media and Democracy" target="_self">Center for Media and Democracy</a> and <a href="http://www.banksterusa.org" title="reference on BanksterUSA" target="_blank">BanksterUSA</a> are pleased to present our Golden Throne Award to <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=T._Timothy_Ryan_Jr." title="reference on T. Timothy Ryan Jr." target="_self">T. Timothy Ryan Jr.</a>, President and Chief Executive Officer of the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Securities_Industries_and_Financial_Markets_Association" title="reference on Securities Industries and Financial Markets Association" target="_self">Securities Industries and Financial Markets Association</a> (SIFMA). SIFMA is the leading behind-the-scenes lobby group representing big banks and investment firms, as well as broker-dealers and other peddlers of financial instruments, which <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Warren_Buffett" title="reference on Warren Buffett" target="_self">Warren Buffett</a> labeled &quot;weapons of mass destruction.&quot; SIFMA lobbies Congress and financial regulators, and handles securities-related press for <a href="http://www.sifma.org/about/members/" title="reference on some of the biggest players in the financial crisis" target="_blank">some of the biggest players in the financial crisis</a>--<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Goldman_Sachs" title="reference on Goldman Sachs" target="_self">Goldman Sachs</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bank_of_America" title="reference on Bank of America" target="_self">Bank of America</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=AIG" title="reference on AIG" target="_self">AIG</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Merrill_Lynch" title="reference on Merrill Lynch" target="_self">Merrill Lynch</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Citigroup" title="reference on Citigroup" target="_self">Citigroup</a>, and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fidelity_Investments" title="reference on Fidelity Investments" target="_self">Fidelity Investments</a>.
</p><p><a href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/8876">read more</a></p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581558" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8876#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:02:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581558&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8876</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/726">banking</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8876 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Mary Bottari]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: Luntz Backs the Big Lie</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are on the defensive. As we enter the 2010 election cycle, Republicans are a bit worried that Americans might remember how their maniacal push to deregulate Wall Street resulted in the collapse of the global economy on their watch. They need a new message to appeal to hard-hit voters. To the rescue comes renowned Republican strategist and spinmeister <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Frank_Luntz" title="reference on Frank Luntz" target="_self">Frank Luntz</a>. Luntz, who has been reprimanded by American Association for Public Opinion Research for his misleading polling work, <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/02/01/luntz_finds_the_words_to_kill_financial_reform.html" title="reference on advises" target="_blank">advises</a> Republicans to keep it simple: 1) Never minimize the pain of those suffering from the crisis; 2) Acknowledge the need for reform that ensures it never happens again; 3) Then lie, lie, lie. The killer lie? Characterize any meaningful Wall Street reform legislation as “the big bank bailout bill.” In reality, the financial reform package passed by the Democratic House of Representatives would create a mechanism for the resolution of failing financial institutions that would shift responsibility for any future bailout from the taxpayers to the largest financial institutions themselves. These institutions would prepay into a crisis fund, much like the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=FDIC" title="reference on FDIC" target="_self">FDIC</a>’s long-standing fund for failing banks. Various Republican proposals to unwind these institutions are far more likely to leave taxpayers holding the bag. <em>Think Progress</em> points out that Luntz’ <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/01/luntz-finance-industry/" title="reference on client list" target="_blank">client list</a> includes a group of financial institutions desperate to prevent the creation of a <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Consumer_Financial_Protection_Agency" title="reference on Consumer Financial Protection Agency" target="_self">Consumer Financial Protection Agency</a> that would crack down on their deceptive practices. Among his clients are Ameriquest, the subprime mortgage dealer, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Express" title="reference on American Express" target="_self">American Express</a>, the credit card giant and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Merrill_Lynch" title="reference on Merrill Lynch" target="_self">Merrill Lynch</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bear_Sterns" title="reference on Bear Sterns" target="_self">Bear Sterns</a>. The <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/LanguageofFinancialReform.pdf" title="reference on Luntz memo" target="_blank">Luntz memo</a> is a warning to Democrats. If they don’t pass tough strong structural reforms that truly prevent the next crisis and communicate that message clearly to the voters, they will be defeated by the big lie. To read the memo which was leaked to the <em>Huffington Post</em>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/01/frank-luntz-pens-memo-to_n_444332.html" title="reference on click here." target="_blank">click here.</a>
</p><img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493581559" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.prwatch.org/node/8875#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493581559&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prwatch.org%2Fnode%2F8875</link>
      <category domain="http://www.prwatch.org/taxonomy/term/724">BanksterUSA</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8875 at http://www.prwatch.org</guid>
      <source url="http://www.prwatch.org/rss.xml">Center for Media and Democracy - Publishers of PR Watch</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Mary Bottari]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama's Class Conflict</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Washington Post's Eli Saslow (2/3/10) on Obama:
He is a rare president who comes from the middle class, yet people still perceive him as disconnected from it.
It's true that very few presidents come from the middle class--except for Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry Truman, Herbert [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=492086062" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/02/03/obamas-class-conflict/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:02:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=492086062&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fair.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fobamas-class-conflict%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Washington Post</strong>'s Eli Saslow (<a title="WP: Despite his roots, Obama struggles to show he's connected to middle class" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/02/AR2010020202644.html?hpid=topnews" target="_blank">2/3/10</a>) on Obama:</p>
<blockquote><p>He is a rare president who comes from the middle class, yet people still perceive him as disconnected from it.</p></blockquote>
<p>It's true that very few presidents come from the middle class--except for Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry Truman, Herbert Hoover, Calvin Coolidge, Warren Harding and Woodrow Wilson, it's hard to think of a single example from the last hundred years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Politics</category>
      <guid>http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13625</guid>
      <source url="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/">FAIR Blog</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Jim Naureckas]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Journalists Examine Teapot Tempests as Real Glaciers Melt</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Curtis Brainard of CJR's Observatory blog (1/29/10) complains about the lack of coverage of what he calls "Glaciergate":
Almost two weeks ago, the Sunday Times, a British newspaper, "broke" the story that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had made significant errors in its 2007 report on the impacts of global warming....
The report stated that there [...]<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=492086063" />
]]></description>
      <comments>http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/02/02/journalists-examine-teapot-tempests-as-real-glaciers-melt/#comments</comments>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:15:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=492086063&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fair.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F02%2F02%2Fjournalists-examine-teapot-tempests-as-real-glaciers-melt%2F</link>
      <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Curtis Brainard of <strong>CJR</strong>'s <strong>Observatory</strong> blog (<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/mia_on_the_ipcc.php">1/29/10</a>) complains about the lack of coverage of what he calls "Glaciergate":</p>
<blockquote><p>Almost two weeks ago, the <strong>Sunday Times</strong>, a British newspaper, "broke" the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece" target="_blank">story</a> that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had made significant errors in its 2007 <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg2.htm" target="_blank">report</a> on the impacts of global warming....</p>
<p>The report <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch10s10-6-2.html" target="_blank">stated</a> that there was a very high likelihood that glaciers in the Himalayas would disappear by 2035 if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate. Three days after the <strong>Times</strong> published its article, the IPCC essentially admitted that this was an error (while glaciers in the region are melting, they are unlikely to vanish that quickly) and <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/himalaya-statement-20january2010.pdf" target="_blank">apologized (pdf)</a> for the "poorly substantiated" claim.</p>
<p>In the days after the story first broke, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/science/earth/19climate.html" target="_blank"><strong>New York Times</strong></a> and the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/23/AR2010012302399.html?wprss=rss_nation/science" target="_blank"><strong>Washington Post</strong></a> each ran one print article about the Himalayan glaciers error. The <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0121/Himalayan-glaciers-gone-by-2035-IPCC-mistaken" target="_blank"><strong>Christian Science Monitor</strong></a>, now published online, produced one piece, and the<strong> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_sc/sci_un_climate_change" target="_blank">Associated Press</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&amp;sid=a.Y7tFNVis00" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a></strong> sent a couple of articles over the wire.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that’s about it. Meanwhile, outlets in the U.K., India and Australia have been eating the American media's lunch, churning out reams of commentary and analysis. Journalists in the U.S. should take immediate steps to redress that oversight.</p></blockquote>
<p>But the <strong>New York Times</strong> never reported the IPCC's claim that the Himalayan glaciers would be gone by 2035 before publishing the debunking article.  The <strong>Washington Post</strong> mentioned it in a story (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/21/AR2009112102010.html" target="_blank">11/22/09</a>) that focused on the Indian environmental minister's rejection of the claim. The <strong>Christian Science Monitor</strong> had one piece (<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/1999/1105/p7s1.html?s=widep">11/5/99</a>) on melting Himalayan glaciers that quoted a source saying "the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 is very high"--but this was not a quote from the IPCC report, which wouldn't appear for another eight years, but from the International Commission on Snow and Ice, which was part of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences.</p>
<p>None of these papers, then, thought that the IPCC's statement that the Himalayan glaciers would likely melt by 2035 was in itself worth mentioning, let alone basing a story around. So how much effort should the same papers spend reporting on the withdrawal of this claim? That depends on whether you think melting glaciers, or scientific misstatements about melting glaciers, are the bigger threat to humanity.</p>
<p>You see the same emphasis on science process trivia over the actual phenomena scientists are studying in a British <strong>Guardian</strong> story headlined "Leaked Climate Change Emails Scientist 'Hid' Data Flaws" (2/1/10), which is no doubt getting a lot of U.S. traffic today via a link from <strong>Drudge</strong>. In the fifth paragraph, the story reveals that contrary to the implication of the headline and subhead ("Key study by East Anglia professor Phil Jones was based on suspect figures"), the story actually has no bearing on the reality of climate change:</p>
<blockquote><p>The revelations on the inadequacies of the 1990 paper do not undermine the case that humans are causing climate change, and other studies have produced similar findings. But they do call into question the probity of some climate change science.</p></blockquote>
<p>And how do they do that, exactly?</p>
<blockquote><p>Wang was cleared of scientific fraud by his university, but new information brought to light today indicates at least one senior colleague had serious concerns about the affair.</p></blockquote>
<p>So essentially this story reveals that before a scientist was cleared of suspicions of scientific wrongdoing, he was suspected of scientific wrongdoing.  Stop the presses!</p>
<p>That a respectable paper like the <strong>Guardian</strong> would trumpet this as an important scoop--and that a media watchdog like <strong>CJR</strong> would be calling for more in this vein--is a testimony to how deeply the "Climategate" hackers have distorted the discussion over the most important environmental issue of our lifetimes. See the brand-new issue of <strong>Extra!</strong>: "'Climategate' Overshadows Copenhagen: Media Regress to the Bad Old Days of False Balance" (<a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4006">2/10</a>) by Julie Hollar.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Environment</category>
      <guid>http://www.fair.org/blog/?p=13620</guid>
      <source url="http://www.fair.org/blog/feed/">FAIR Blog</source>
      <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><![CDATA[Jim Naureckas]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comments of the Week</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Every Friday, we excerpt some of the most insightful, articulate, interesting, and entertaining comments we receive each week. Think we’ve missed something? Well…comment! (This article has been expanded since it was first posted.) The Great Paywall Debate After news that Newsday has drawn only 35 Web subscribers since its site went behind a paywall drew scorn from some industry-watchers, Ryan...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330271" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330271&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fcomments_of_the_week_8.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/comments_of_the_week_8.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Endangered Species</title>
      <description><![CDATA[When it comes to the layoffs and buyouts that have hit newspapers over the last couple of years, copy editors seem to be the most at risk of losing their jobs. So it wasn’t too much of a shock when Leslie Norman’s husband was laid off from his copy editing position at The Wall Street Journal.  But then last...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330272" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:18:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330272&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fregret_the_error%2Fendangered_species.php</link>
      <category>Regret the Error</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/regret_the_error/endangered_species.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Washington Post Scrubs a Post about the Post</title>
      <description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, Bill Turque, the Washington Post’s education beat reporter, posted an excellent blog item showing his readers a little bit of the inside game at his paper. It was titled “One Newspaper, Two Stories”—a title that, by the end of the day, would become more apt than Turque ever could have expected.  That’s because editors pulled the post...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330273" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330273&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fthe_washington_post_scrubs_a_p.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_washington_post_scrubs_a_p.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comments of the Week</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Every Friday, we excerpt some of the most insightful, articulate, interesting, and entertaining comments we receive each week. Think we’ve missed something? Well…comment! Reporters Doubling as Docs in Haiti On Wednesday, Curtis Brainard wrote about television journalists in Haiti who are also trained as doctors, and the journalistic ethics involved when someone like CBS’s Jennifer Ashton or CNN’s Sanjay...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330274" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330274&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fcomments_of_the_week_5.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/comments_of_the_week_5.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Haiti’s Earthquake a “Game-Changer”?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In the days after Haiti’s earthquake, several observers have expressed hope that the disaster could, ultimately, be a game-changer for the country. Robert Maguire, head of the Haiti program at Trinity University in Washington, D.C., has noted, “There’s a potential silver-lining in a deep, dark cloud.” And New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote, “Far more...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330275" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:55:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330275&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fis_haitis_earthquake_a_gamecha.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/is_haitis_earthquake_a_gamecha.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"I Can't Take it Anymore"</title>
      <description><![CDATA[“Earthquake rocks Port-au-Prince,” read the brief news item. I let out a yell. The first report Tuesday evening mentioned only some damaged buildings, but I was worried. Having recently returned from three months working as a correspondent for the Haitian Times in Port-au-Prince, I knew how vulnerable the city—dominated by haphazardly built settlements clinging to steep...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330276" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330276&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fi_cant_take_it_anymore.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/i_cant_take_it_anymore.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Truth Is No Defense</title>
      <description><![CDATA[I was five minutes from my house in Ljubljana, Slovenia when my neighbor called. The police were there looking for me, he said. I had no idea why I would deserve such attention, but I stayed elsewhere for a while—whatever it was, it couldn't be good. When the police are looking for you it's best not to be found, particularly...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330277" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330277&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fthe_truth_is_no_defense.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_truth_is_no_defense.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Steve Lovelady, Editor</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Steve Lovelady, who helped launch the Columbia Journalism Review into the digital realm after a stellar career as a serious editor, died of cancer last Friday at sixty-six. He died in Key West, where he had gone with his wife, Ann Kolson, to their vacation home. Lovelady was a something of a wizard with words and story ideas—“a magician,” as...<img alt="" src="http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;s_item=493330278" />
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://xfruits.com/yhblogger/?id=77067&amp;clic=493330278&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cjr.org%2Fbehind_the_news%2Fsteve_lovelady_editor.php</link>
      <category>Behind the News</category>
      <guid>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/steve_lovelady_editor.php</guid>
      <source url="http://www.cjr.org/Behind%20the%20News.xml">CJR</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
